PAYR vs. FLCV

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

PAYR (Federated Hermes Enhanced Income ETF) and FLCV (Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PAYR is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Federated, while FLCV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Federated. Both are actively managed. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PAYR charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for FLCV.

Performance

PAYR vs. FLCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Enhanced Income ETF (PAYR) and Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF (FLCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAYR achieves a 15.39% return, which is significantly lower than FLCV's 19.30% return.

PAYR

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 1.96%
• 6M: 9.58%
• YTD: 15.39%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

FLCV

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 3.61%
• 6M: 14.47%
• YTD: 19.30%
• 1Y: 27.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 20.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FLCV Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF	$2.45M	$1.82M	$954.90K
PAYR Federated Hermes Enhanced Income ETF	$817.86K	$1.10M	$683.22K

PAYR vs. FLCV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PAYR Federated Hermes Enhanced Income ETF	15.39%	3.30%
FLCV Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF	19.30%	3.01%

Correlation

The correlation between PAYR and FLCV is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025	0.41

Return for Risk

PAYR vs. FLCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PAYR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FLCV

FLCV Risk / Return Rank: 91
FLCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FLCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
FLCV Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FLCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
FLCV Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PAYR vs. FLCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Enhanced Income ETF (PAYR) and Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF (FLCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PAYR	FLCV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.40	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.43	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.43	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.82	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	18.82	—

Drawdowns

PAYR vs. FLCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAYR drawdown since its inception was -5.24%, smaller than the maximum FLCV drawdown of -15.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAYR and FLCV.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAYR	FLCV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.24%	-15.93%	+10.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.70%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.71%	0.00%	-1.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.53%	-1.91%	+0.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.46%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PAYR	FLCV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.36%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.43%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.15%	11.44%	-0.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.15%	14.67%	-3.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.15%	14.67%	-3.52%

PAYR vs. FLCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAYR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCV's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

PAYR vs. FLCV - Dividend Comparison

PAYR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.56%, more than FLCV's 0.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FLCV Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF	0.69%	0.83%	0.24%
PAYR Federated Hermes Enhanced Income ETF	6.56%	1.99%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PAYR and FLCV in my portfolio?

PAYR and FLCV have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PAYR or FLCV?

On fees, FLCV is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PAYR or FLCV?

FLCV is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for PAYR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PAYR or FLCV?

PAYR has the higher dividend yield at 6.56%, compared with 0.69% for FLCV.

What is the main difference between PAYR and FLCV?

PAYR is categorized as Derivative Income, while FLCV is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for PAYR and 0.32% for FLCV.