PAYH vs. FTQI
PAYH (TrueShares S&P Autocallable High Income ETF) and FTQI (First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PAYH is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by TrueShares, while FTQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. PAYH is actively managed, while FTQI is passively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PAYH charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FTQI.
Performance
PAYH vs. FTQI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAYH achieves a 9.58% return, which is significantly lower than FTQI's 12.76% return.
PAYH
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 1.80%
- 6M
- 7.88%
- YTD
- 9.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTQI
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- 6M
- 11.68%
- YTD
- 12.76%
- 1Y
- 26.34%
- 3Y*
- 16.62%
- 5Y*
- 12.26%
- 10Y*
- 7.85%
PAYH vs. FTQI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PAYH TrueShares S&P Autocallable High Income ETF | 9.58% | -0.73% |
FTQI First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF | 12.76% | -0.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAYH and FTQI is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2025 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAYH vs. FTQI — Risk / Return Rank
PAYH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FTQI
PAYH vs. FTQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares S&P Autocallable High Income ETF (PAYH) and First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PAYH | FTQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.45 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.24 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 20.07 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PAYH vs. FTQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAYH drawdown since its inception was -16.33%, smaller than the maximum FTQI drawdown of -19.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAYH and FTQI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAYH | FTQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.33% | -19.42% | +3.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -19.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.59% | -0.85% | +0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.54% | -3.73% | +1.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.32% | — |
Volatility
PAYH vs. FTQI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAYH | FTQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.92% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.83% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.79% | 10.87% | +10.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.79% | 14.82% | +6.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.79% | 12.98% | +8.81% |
PAYH vs. FTQI - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAYH has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than FTQI's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
PAYH vs. FTQI - Dividend Comparison
PAYH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.88%, less than FTQI's 10.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTQI First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF | 10.92% | 11.46% | 11.66% | 11.49% | 9.85% | 3.05% | 3.27% | 2.95% | 3.27% | 2.74% | 3.02% | 3.54% |
PAYH TrueShares S&P Autocallable High Income ETF | 7.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PAYH and FTQI have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PAYH is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PAYH is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FTQI.
FTQI has the higher dividend yield at 10.92%, compared with 7.88% for PAYH.
PAYH is categorized as Derivative Income, while FTQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for PAYH and 0.75% for FTQI.
Find the right allocation for PAYH and FTQI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer