PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAYH vs. ARMW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAYH vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares S&P Autocallable High Income ETF (PAYH) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAYH achieves a 8.63% return, which is significantly lower than ARMW's 336.58% return.


PAYH

1D
-0.66%
1M
0.43%
YTD
8.63%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ARMW

1D
-5.75%
1M
108.38%
YTD
336.58%
6M
222.15%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAYH vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PAYH and ARMW is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2025

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAYH vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares S&P Autocallable High Income ETF (PAYH) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PAYH vs. ARMW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAYHARMWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

4.33

-3.48

Drawdowns

PAYH vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAYH drawdown since its inception was -16.33%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAYH and ARMW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAYHARMWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.33%

-48.47%

+32.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

-5.75%

+4.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.76%

-26.42%

+23.66%

Volatility

PAYH vs. ARMW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAYHARMWDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.64%

88.57%

-64.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.64%

88.57%

-64.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.64%

88.57%

-64.93%

PAYH vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAYH has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than ARMW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAYH vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison

PAYH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.46%, less than ARMW's 16.13% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


PAYH and ARMW have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PAYH is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PAYH is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for ARMW.

ARMW has the higher dividend yield at 16.13%, compared with 6.46% for PAYH.

They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for PAYH and 0.99% for ARMW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAYH and ARMW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer