PAYG.TO vs. TLF.TO

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

PAYG.TO (Brompton Global Equity HighPay ETF) and TLF.TO (Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PAYG.TO is a Global Equity Income fund actively managed by Brompton, while TLF.TO is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Brompton. Both are actively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

PAYG.TO vs. TLF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Brompton Global Equity HighPay ETF (PAYG.TO) and Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF (TLF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PAYG.TO

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: -1.34%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TLF.TO

• 1D: -1.10%
• 1M: -5.97%
• 6M: 18.82%
• YTD: 21.68%
• 1Y: 32.76%
• 3Y*: 23.48%
• 5Y*: 16.03%
• 10Y*: 21.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAYG.TO vs. TLF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
PAYG.TO Brompton Global Equity HighPay ETF	9.52%
TLF.TO Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF	28.97%

Correlation

The correlation between PAYG.TO and TLF.TO is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026	0.65

Return for Risk

PAYG.TO vs. TLF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAYG.TO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TLF.TO

TLF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 53
TLF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
TLF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
TLF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 50
TLF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
TLF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAYG.TO vs. TLF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Global Equity HighPay ETF (PAYG.TO) and Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF (TLF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PAYG.TO	TLF.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.34	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.75	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.24	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.23	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.57	—

Drawdowns

PAYG.TO vs. TLF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAYG.TO drawdown since its inception was -7.38%, smaller than the maximum TLF.TO drawdown of -37.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAYG.TO and TLF.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAYG.TO	TLF.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.38%	-37.19%	+29.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.73%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.99%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-37.19%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.19%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.63%	-10.89%	+5.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.49%	-7.35%	+4.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.34%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PAYG.TO	TLF.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	13.70%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	21.97%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.30%	24.65%	-3.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.30%	25.84%	-4.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.30%	24.22%	-2.92%

Dividends

PAYG.TO vs. TLF.TO - Dividend Comparison

PAYG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.39%, less than TLF.TO's 5.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PAYG.TO Brompton Global Equity HighPay ETF	5.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TLF.TO Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF	5.66%	5.90%	5.86%	5.31%	6.97%	3.40%	3.49%	4.64%	6.05%	5.94%	7.67%	7.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PAYG.TO and TLF.TO in my portfolio?

PAYG.TO and TLF.TO have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

What is the main difference between PAYG.TO and TLF.TO?

PAYG.TO is categorized as Global Equity Income, while TLF.TO is Technology Equities.