PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAYG.TO vs. QDAY.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAYG.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Brompton Global Equity HighPay ETF (PAYG.TO) and Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF (QDAY.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PAYG.TO

1D
-1.21%
1M
0.06%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QDAY.NEO

1D
-1.79%
1M
1.97%
6M
23.61%
YTD
28.18%
1Y
47.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAYG.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PAYG.TO and QDAY.NEO is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026

0.63

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAYG.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Global Equity HighPay ETF (PAYG.TO) and Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF (QDAY.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PAYG.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PAYG.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAYG.TO drawdown since its inception was -7.38%, smaller than the maximum QDAY.NEO drawdown of -19.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAYG.TO and QDAY.NEO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAYG.TOQDAY.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.38%

-19.44%

+12.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.64%

-3.49%

-1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.38%

-5.05%

+2.67%

Volatility

PAYG.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAYG.TOQDAY.NEODifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.42%

25.29%

-3.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.42%

25.29%

-3.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.42%

25.29%

-3.87%

Dividends

PAYG.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Dividend Comparison

PAYG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, less than QDAY.NEO's 16.06% yield.


PositionTTM2025
PAYG.TO
Brompton Global Equity HighPay ETF
4.54%0.00%
QDAY.NEO
Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF
16.06%8.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAYG.TO and QDAY.NEO have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PAYG.TO is categorized as Global Equity Income, while QDAY.NEO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Brompton and Hamilton Capital.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAYG.TO and QDAY.NEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer