PAYF.TO vs. HBNK.TO

Last updated Jul 25, 2026

PAYF.TO (Purpose Enhanced Premium Yield Fund) and HBNK.TO (Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PAYF.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Purpose Investments Inc., while HBNK.TO is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index. PAYF.TO is actively managed, while HBNK.TO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PAYF.TO returned 9.76%/yr vs 35.76%/yr for HBNK.TO. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PAYF.TO charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for HBNK.TO.

Performance

PAYF.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Enhanced Premium Yield Fund (PAYF.TO) and Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (HBNK.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAYF.TO achieves a 3.05% return, which is significantly lower than HBNK.TO's 32.24% return.

PAYF.TO

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 1.03%
• 6M: 3.10%
• YTD: 3.05%
• 1Y: 4.97%
• 3Y*: 9.76%
• 5Y*: 7.55%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.21%

HBNK.TO

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: 1.72%
• 6M: 30.88%
• YTD: 32.24%
• 1Y: 66.22%
• 3Y*: 35.76%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 36.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
HBNK.TO Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF	CA$1.48M	CA$1.43M	CA$1.36M
PAYF.TO Purpose Enhanced Premium Yield Fund	CA$14.58K	CA$14.42K	CA$25.69K

PAYF.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PAYF.TO Purpose Enhanced Premium Yield Fund	3.05%	9.96%	11.58%	6.56%
HBNK.TO Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF	32.24%	43.71%	24.77%	9.82%

Correlation

The correlation between PAYF.TO and HBNK.TO is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2023	0.41

Return for Risk

PAYF.TO vs. HBNK.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAYF.TO

PAYF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 30
PAYF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
PAYF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
PAYF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 30
PAYF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
PAYF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 33

HBNK.TO

HBNK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 98
HBNK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
HBNK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
HBNK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 98
HBNK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
HBNK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAYF.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Enhanced Premium Yield Fund (PAYF.TO) and Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (HBNK.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PAYF.TO	HBNK.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.71	4.87	-4.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.07	6.36	-5.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.85	-0.71
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.87	7.85	-6.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.13	33.28	-30.15

PAYF.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAYF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the HBNK.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAYF.TO and HBNK.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PAYF.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAYF.TO drawdown since its inception was -17.09%, which is greater than HBNK.TO's maximum drawdown of -14.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAYF.TO and HBNK.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAYF.TO	HBNK.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.09%	-14.78%	-2.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.73%	-8.48%	+2.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.66%	-14.78%	+3.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-11.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.91%	-3.30%	+2.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.85%	-2.24%	+0.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.59%	2.00%	-0.41%

Volatility

PAYF.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Purpose Enhanced Premium Yield Fund (PAYF.TO) is 2.31%, while Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (HBNK.TO) has a volatility of 4.80%. This indicates that PAYF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HBNK.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAYF.TO	HBNK.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.31%	4.80%	-2.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.35%	11.87%	-5.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.02%	13.67%	-6.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.66%	12.82%	-3.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.51%	12.82%	-3.31%

PAYF.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAYF.TO has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than HBNK.TO's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

PAYF.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Dividend Comparison

PAYF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.88%, more than HBNK.TO's 2.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
HBNK.TO Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF	2.56%	3.24%	4.15%	2.45%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PAYF.TO Purpose Enhanced Premium Yield Fund	8.88%	8.75%	8.82%	8.91%	8.02%	7.17%	7.27%	4.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PAYF.TO and HBNK.TO in my portfolio?

PAYF.TO and HBNK.TO have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PAYF.TO or HBNK.TO?

On fees, HBNK.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PAYF.TO or HBNK.TO?

HBNK.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.94% for PAYF.TO.

What is the main difference between PAYF.TO and HBNK.TO?

PAYF.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while HBNK.TO is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Purpose Investments Inc. and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.94% for PAYF.TO and 0.09% for HBNK.TO.