PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAYF.TO vs. ENCL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAYF.TO vs. ENCL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Enhanced Premium Yield Fund (PAYF.TO) and Global X Enhanced Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF CAD (ENCL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAYF.TO achieves a 3.05% return, which is significantly lower than ENCL.TO's 41.62% return.


PAYF.TO

1D
0.27%
1M
1.03%
6M
3.10%
YTD
3.05%
1Y
4.97%
3Y*
9.76%
5Y*
7.55%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.21%

ENCL.TO

1D
-0.13%
1M
10.79%
6M
34.95%
YTD
41.62%
1Y
55.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
21.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$1.48MCA$1.31MCA$1.61M
CA$14.58KCA$14.42KCA$25.69K

PAYF.TO vs. ENCL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PAYF.TO
Purpose Enhanced Premium Yield Fund
3.05%9.96%11.58%5.44%
ENCL.TO
Global X Enhanced Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF CAD
41.62%14.97%20.32%-11.68%

Correlation

The correlation between PAYF.TO and ENCL.TO is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2023

0.09

The correlation between PAYF.TO and ENCL.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAYF.TO vs. ENCL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAYF.TO
PAYF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
PAYF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAYF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAYF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
PAYF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAYF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

ENCL.TO
ENCL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ENCL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENCL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENCL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
ENCL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENCL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAYF.TO vs. ENCL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Enhanced Premium Yield Fund (PAYF.TO) and Global X Enhanced Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF CAD (ENCL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PAYF.TOENCL.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.49

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.87

5.15

-4.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.13

14.94

-11.82

PAYF.TO vs. ENCL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAYF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the ENCL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAYF.TO and ENCL.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PAYF.TO vs. ENCL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAYF.TO drawdown since its inception was -17.09%, smaller than the maximum ENCL.TO drawdown of -21.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAYF.TO and ENCL.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAYF.TOENCL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.09%

-21.05%

+3.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.73%

-10.75%

+5.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.91%

-0.13%

-0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.85%

-4.83%

+2.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

3.70%

-2.11%

Volatility

PAYF.TO vs. ENCL.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Purpose Enhanced Premium Yield Fund (PAYF.TO) is 2.31%, while Global X Enhanced Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF CAD (ENCL.TO) has a volatility of 5.94%. This indicates that PAYF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENCL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAYF.TOENCL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.31%

5.94%

-3.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.35%

15.71%

-9.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.02%

19.13%

-12.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.66%

20.94%

-11.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.51%

20.94%

-11.43%

PAYF.TO vs. ENCL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAYF.TO has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is lower than ENCL.TO's 1.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAYF.TO vs. ENCL.TO - Dividend Comparison

PAYF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.88%, less than ENCL.TO's 13.08% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
ENCL.TO
Global X Enhanced Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF CAD
13.08%17.14%18.56%4.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PAYF.TO
Purpose Enhanced Premium Yield Fund
8.88%8.75%8.82%8.91%8.02%7.17%7.27%4.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAYF.TO and ENCL.TO have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PAYF.TO is cheaper at 0.94% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PAYF.TO is cheaper with a 0.94% expense ratio, compared with 1.86% for ENCL.TO.

PAYF.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while ENCL.TO is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Purpose Investments Inc. and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.94% for PAYF.TO and 1.86% for ENCL.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAYF.TO and ENCL.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer