PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAXLX vs. YFSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAXLX vs. YFSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PAX LARGE CAP FUND (PAXLX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAXLX achieves a 4.36% return, which is significantly lower than YFSIX's 27.94% return.


PAXLX

1D
-0.35%
1M
3.32%
YTD
4.36%
6M
3.96%
1Y
16.78%
3Y*
14.13%
5Y*
7.33%
10Y*

YFSIX

1D
-0.24%
1M
5.24%
YTD
27.94%
6M
15.38%
1Y
32.86%
3Y*
17.40%
5Y*
9.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAXLX vs. YFSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAXLX
PAX LARGE CAP FUND
4.36%12.17%13.96%19.96%-20.01%30.64%23.75%34.88%-5.38%19.24%
YFSIX
AMG Yacktman Global Fund
27.94%14.91%-0.34%16.64%-9.15%13.13%18.46%24.40%2.18%20.95%

Correlation

The correlation between PAXLX and YFSIX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2017

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between PAXLX and YFSIX has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAXLX vs. YFSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAXLX
PAXLX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
PAXLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAXLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAXLX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
PAXLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAXLX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

YFSIX
YFSIX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
YFSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YFSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
YFSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
YFSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
YFSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAXLX vs. YFSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PAX LARGE CAP FUND (PAXLX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PAXLXYFSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.37

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

2.31

-0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.82

7.30

-2.48

PAXLX vs. YFSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAXLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the YFSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAXLX and YFSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAXLXYFSIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

1.54

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.59

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.82

-0.16

Drawdowns

PAXLX vs. YFSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAXLX drawdown since its inception was -32.73%, smaller than the maximum YFSIX drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAXLX and YFSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAXLXYFSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.73%

-35.10%

+2.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.12%

-14.20%

+1.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.48%

-14.20%

-14.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.48%

-25.14%

-3.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-0.24%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.20%

-4.90%

-1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.62%

4.47%

-0.85%

Volatility

PAXLX vs. YFSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PAX LARGE CAP FUND (PAXLX) is 3.15%, while AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX) has a volatility of 5.82%. This indicates that PAXLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YFSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAXLXYFSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.15%

5.82%

-2.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.98%

20.77%

-11.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.79%

21.35%

-9.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.50%

15.39%

+4.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.56%

16.25%

+3.31%

PAXLX vs. YFSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAXLX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than YFSIX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAXLX vs. YFSIX - Dividend Comparison

PAXLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.15%, while YFSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PAXLX
PAX LARGE CAP FUND
28.15%29.38%18.38%4.28%2.92%5.80%6.67%3.49%25.45%13.18%0.07%
YFSIX
AMG Yacktman Global Fund
0.00%0.00%8.68%8.02%4.32%8.18%4.76%6.59%0.71%2.63%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAXLX and YFSIX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YFSIX has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to PAXLX (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAXLX dropped -32.73% vs YFSIX's -35.10%.

YFSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAXLX and YFSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer