PAXLX vs. YFSIX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PAX LARGE CAP FUND (PAXLX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX).

PAXLX is managed by Pax World. It was launched on Dec 16, 2016. YFSIX is managed by AMG. It was launched on Jan 30, 2017.

Performance

PAXLX vs. YFSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PAX LARGE CAP FUND (PAXLX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PAXLX vs. YFSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PAXLX PAX LARGE CAP FUND	-10.71%	12.17%	13.96%	19.96%	-20.01%	30.64%	23.75%	34.88%	-5.38%	19.24%
YFSIX AMG Yacktman Global Fund	8.16%	14.91%	-0.34%	16.64%	-9.15%	13.13%	18.46%	24.40%	2.18%	20.95%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAXLX achieves a -10.71% return, which is significantly lower than YFSIX's 8.16% return.

PAXLX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: -8.12%
• YTD: -10.71%
• 6M: -11.42%
• 1Y: 7.32%
• 3Y*: 8.94%
• 5Y*: 5.55%
• 10Y*: —

YFSIX

• 1D: -1.07%
• 1M: -10.67%
• YTD: 8.16%
• 6M: 0.34%
• 1Y: 22.29%
• 3Y*: 11.70%
• 5Y*: 6.73%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAXLX vs. YFSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAXLX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than YFSIX's 0.95% expense ratio.

PAXLX

PAX LARGE CAP FUND

YFSIX

AMG Yacktman Global Fund

Return for Risk

PAXLX vs. YFSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAXLX

PAXLX Risk / Return Rank: 16
PAXLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
PAXLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
PAXLX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
PAXLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
PAXLX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

YFSIX

YFSIX Risk / Return Rank: 51
YFSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
YFSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
YFSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
YFSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
YFSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAXLX vs. YFSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PAX LARGE CAP FUND (PAXLX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PAXLX	YFSIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.44	0.99	-0.55
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.75	1.16	-0.42
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.26	-0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.44	1.36	-0.93
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.58	4.42	-2.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PAXLX vs. YFSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAXLX Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the YFSIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAXLX and YFSIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PAXLX	YFSIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44	0.99	-0.55
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29	0.45	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	0.71	-0.13

Correlation

The correlation between PAXLX and YFSIX is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

PAXLX vs. YFSIX - Dividend Comparison

PAXLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 32.90%, while YFSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
PAXLX PAX LARGE CAP FUND	32.90%	29.38%	18.38%	4.28%	2.92%	5.80%	6.67%	3.49%	25.45%	13.18%	0.07%
YFSIX AMG Yacktman Global Fund	0.00%	0.00%	8.68%	8.02%	4.32%	8.18%	4.76%	6.59%	0.71%	2.63%	0.00%

Drawdowns

PAXLX vs. YFSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAXLX drawdown since its inception was -32.73%, smaller than the maximum YFSIX drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAXLX and YFSIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAXLX	YFSIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.73%	-35.10%	+2.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.12%	-14.20%	+1.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.48%	-25.14%	-3.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.14%	-11.03%	-3.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.25%	-4.93%	-1.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.61%	4.38%	-0.77%

Volatility

PAXLX vs. YFSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PAX LARGE CAP FUND (PAXLX) is 4.18%, while AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX) has a volatility of 9.23%. This indicates that PAXLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YFSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAXLX	YFSIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.18%	9.23%	-5.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.68%	19.89%	-11.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.39%	21.29%	-3.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.48%	15.11%	+4.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.66%	16.20%	+3.46%