PAXLX vs. TANDX
PAXLX (PAX LARGE CAP FUND) and TANDX (Castle Tandem Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, PAXLX returned 7.33%/yr vs 1.63%/yr for TANDX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PAXLX charges 0.97%/yr vs 1.59%/yr for TANDX.
Performance
PAXLX vs. TANDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAXLX achieves a 4.36% return, which is significantly higher than TANDX's -13.18% return.
PAXLX
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 3.32%
- YTD
- 4.36%
- 6M
- 3.96%
- 1Y
- 16.78%
- 3Y*
- 14.13%
- 5Y*
- 7.33%
- 10Y*
- —
TANDX
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- -3.85%
- YTD
- -13.18%
- 6M
- -13.13%
- 1Y
- -15.71%
- 3Y*
- 1.15%
- 5Y*
- 1.63%
- 10Y*
- —
PAXLX vs. TANDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAXLX PAX LARGE CAP FUND | 4.36% | 12.17% | 13.96% | 19.96% | -20.01% | 30.64% | 23.75% | 20.92% |
TANDX Castle Tandem Fund | -13.18% | 3.67% | 7.66% | 8.42% | -7.87% | 19.03% | 13.39% | 12.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAXLX and TANDX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2019 | 0.79 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PAXLX and TANDX has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAXLX vs. TANDX — Risk / Return Rank
PAXLX
TANDX
PAXLX vs. TANDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PAX LARGE CAP FUND (PAXLX) and Castle Tandem Fund (TANDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PAXLX | TANDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 0.74 | +0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | -0.98 | +2.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.82 | -2.30 | +7.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PAXLX | TANDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | -1.70 | +3.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.00 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.01 | +0.65 |
Drawdowns
PAXLX vs. TANDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAXLX drawdown since its inception was -32.73%, smaller than the maximum TANDX drawdown of -93.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAXLX and TANDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAXLX | TANDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.73% | -93.93% | +61.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.12% | -16.13% | +3.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.48% | -93.93% | +65.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.48% | -93.93% | +65.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.35% | -93.93% | +93.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.20% | -20.25% | +14.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.62% | 6.85% | -3.23% |
Volatility
PAXLX vs. TANDX - Volatility Comparison
PAX LARGE CAP FUND (PAXLX) has a higher volatility of 3.15% compared to Castle Tandem Fund (TANDX) at 2.52%. This indicates that PAXLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TANDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAXLX | TANDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.15% | 2.52% | +0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.98% | 7.18% | +1.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.79% | 9.26% | +2.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.50% | 595.57% | -576.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.56% | 496.55% | -476.99% |
PAXLX vs. TANDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAXLX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than TANDX's 1.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
PAXLX vs. TANDX - Dividend Comparison
PAXLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.15%, more than TANDX's 7.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAXLX PAX LARGE CAP FUND | 28.15% | 29.38% | 18.38% | 4.28% | 2.92% | 5.80% | 6.67% | 3.49% | 25.45% | 13.18% | 0.07% |
TANDX Castle Tandem Fund | 7.11% | 6.17% | 3.71% | 2.10% | 1.48% | 4.57% | 0.33% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PAXLX and TANDX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PAXLX has higher volatility (3.15%) compared to TANDX (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAXLX dropped -32.73% vs TANDX's -93.93%.
PAXLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs -1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PAXLX and TANDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer