PAXLX vs. FLCPX
PAXLX (PAX LARGE CAP FUND) and FLCPX (Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, PAXLX returned 7.33%/yr vs 14.29%/yr for FLCPX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. PAXLX charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for FLCPX.
Performance
PAXLX vs. FLCPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAXLX achieves a 4.36% return, which is significantly lower than FLCPX's 11.72% return.
PAXLX
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 3.32%
- YTD
- 4.36%
- 6M
- 3.96%
- 1Y
- 16.78%
- 3Y*
- 14.13%
- 5Y*
- 7.33%
- 10Y*
- —
FLCPX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 5.81%
- YTD
- 11.72%
- 6M
- 11.75%
- 1Y
- 28.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.78%
- 5Y*
- 14.29%
- 10Y*
- 15.67%
PAXLX vs. FLCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAXLX PAX LARGE CAP FUND | 4.36% | 12.17% | 13.96% | 19.96% | -20.01% | 30.64% | 23.75% | 34.88% | -5.38% | 20.69% |
FLCPX Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund | 11.72% | 17.84% | 25.08% | 26.25% | -18.06% | 28.61% | 18.24% | 31.59% | -4.38% | 21.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAXLX and FLCPX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2016 | 0.96 |
The correlation between PAXLX and FLCPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAXLX vs. FLCPX — Risk / Return Rank
PAXLX
FLCPX
PAXLX vs. FLCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PAX LARGE CAP FUND (PAXLX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PAXLX | FLCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.46 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | 3.38 | -2.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.82 | 15.75 | -10.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PAXLX | FLCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | 2.53 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.84 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.92 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
PAXLX vs. FLCPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAXLX drawdown since its inception was -32.73%, roughly equal to the maximum FLCPX drawdown of -33.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAXLX and FLCPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAXLX | FLCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.73% | -33.87% | +1.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.12% | -8.89% | -4.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.48% | -18.76% | -9.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.48% | -24.40% | -4.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.35% | 0.00% | -0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.20% | -4.19% | -2.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.62% | 1.90% | +1.72% |
Volatility
PAXLX vs. FLCPX - Volatility Comparison
PAX LARGE CAP FUND (PAXLX) has a higher volatility of 3.15% compared to Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX) at 2.82%. This indicates that PAXLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAXLX | FLCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.15% | 2.82% | +0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.98% | 8.98% | 0.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.79% | 11.86% | -0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.50% | 17.06% | +2.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.56% | 18.16% | +1.40% |
PAXLX vs. FLCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAXLX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCPX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
PAXLX vs. FLCPX - Dividend Comparison
PAXLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.15%, more than FLCPX's 0.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCPX Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund | 0.50% | 0.56% | 6.11% | 7.05% | 11.23% | 10.38% | 3.93% | 1.74% | 2.18% | 1.57% | 0.76% |
PAXLX PAX LARGE CAP FUND | 28.15% | 29.38% | 18.38% | 4.28% | 2.92% | 5.80% | 6.67% | 3.49% | 25.45% | 13.18% | 0.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, PAXLX and FLCPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PAXLX has higher volatility (3.15%) compared to FLCPX (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAXLX dropped -32.73% vs FLCPX's -33.87%.
FLCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PAXLX and FLCPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer