PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAXDX vs. AIWEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAXDX vs. AIWEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund (PAXDX) and Cavanal Hill World Energy Fund Institutional Class (AIWEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAXDX achieves a 5.11% return, which is significantly lower than AIWEX's 24.90% return.


PAXDX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
5.11%
6M
5.63%
1Y
7.46%
3Y*
7.64%
5Y*
4.02%
10Y*

AIWEX

1D
0.18%
1M
-6.12%
YTD
24.90%
6M
24.51%
1Y
31.02%
3Y*
23.73%
5Y*
20.44%
10Y*
11.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAXDX vs. AIWEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAXDX
Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund
5.11%18.37%-1.55%9.33%-13.45%14.24%14.25%25.88%-4.25%19.24%
AIWEX
Cavanal Hill World Energy Fund Institutional Class
24.90%21.74%13.42%4.93%32.76%36.90%0.25%8.00%-24.31%-1.59%

Correlation

The correlation between PAXDX and AIWEX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2016

0.54

Over the past year, the correlation between PAXDX and AIWEX has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAXDX vs. AIWEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAXDX
PAXDX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
PAXDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAXDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAXDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
PAXDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAXDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

AIWEX
AIWEX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
AIWEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIWEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIWEX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
AIWEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIWEX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAXDX vs. AIWEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund (PAXDX) and Cavanal Hill World Energy Fund Institutional Class (AIWEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PAXDXAIWEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.30

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

3.70

-2.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.03

11.97

-6.94

PAXDX vs. AIWEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAXDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the AIWEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAXDX and AIWEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PAXDX vs. AIWEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAXDX drawdown since its inception was -33.58%, smaller than the maximum AIWEX drawdown of -57.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAXDX and AIWEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAXDXAIWEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.58%

-57.44%

+23.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.49%

-8.58%

+4.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.56%

-23.00%

+8.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.04%

-25.68%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-8.41%

+7.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.25%

-12.76%

+7.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.47%

2.64%

-1.17%

Volatility

PAXDX vs. AIWEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund (PAXDX) is 0.00%, while Cavanal Hill World Energy Fund Institutional Class (AIWEX) has a volatility of 5.59%. This indicates that PAXDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIWEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAXDXAIWEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

5.59%

-5.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.06%

13.37%

-9.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.94%

18.14%

-10.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.16%

25.84%

-12.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.48%

25.90%

-9.42%

PAXDX vs. AIWEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAXDX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than AIWEX's 0.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAXDX vs. AIWEX - Dividend Comparison

PAXDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, more than AIWEX's 0.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIWEX
Cavanal Hill World Energy Fund Institutional Class
0.90%0.81%1.97%1.80%2.18%1.63%1.81%2.27%1.65%0.67%1.22%1.00%
PAXDX
Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund
1.06%2.17%2.07%2.43%2.48%58.94%2.88%4.69%3.55%2.13%0.12%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAXDX and AIWEX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIWEX has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to PAXDX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAXDX dropped -33.58% vs AIWEX's -57.44%.

AIWEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAXDX and AIWEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer