PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAVG.L vs. XUIN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAVG.L vs. XUIN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (PAVG.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Industrials UCITS ETF 1D (XUIN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PAVG.L is traded in GBP, while XUIN.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XUIN.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PAVG.L having a 16.20% return and XUIN.L slightly lower at 15.84%.


PAVG.L

1D
-0.05%
1M
-4.39%
6M
8.66%
YTD
16.20%
1Y
25.44%
3Y*
20.18%
5Y*
10Y*

XUIN.L

1D
0.82%
1M
-2.53%
6M
7.23%
YTD
15.84%
1Y
19.17%
3Y*
18.51%
5Y*
13.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAVG.L vs. XUIN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PAVG.L
Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
16.20%12.40%19.47%24.53%4.64%-24.19%
XUIN.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Industrials UCITS ETF 1D
15.84%9.77%19.17%14.88%4.24%1.43%

Correlation

The correlation between PAVG.L and XUIN.L is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2021

0.84

The correlation between PAVG.L and XUIN.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAVG.L vs. XUIN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAVG.L
PAVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
PAVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
PAVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

XUIN.L
XUIN.L Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
XUIN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUIN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUIN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
XUIN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUIN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAVG.L vs. XUIN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (PAVG.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Industrials UCITS ETF 1D (XUIN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PAVG.LXUIN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.23

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

2.27

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.02

6.97

+1.04

PAVG.L vs. XUIN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAVG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the XUIN.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAVG.L and XUIN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PAVG.L vs. XUIN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAVG.L drawdown since its inception was -34.28%, which is greater than XUIN.L's maximum drawdown of -20.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAVG.L and XUIN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAVG.LXUIN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.28%

-20.87%

-13.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.14%

-9.19%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.81%

-20.87%

-7.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.76%

-4.56%

-2.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.99%

-3.49%

-8.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

3.00%

+0.17%

Volatility

PAVG.L vs. XUIN.L - Volatility Comparison

Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (PAVG.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Industrials UCITS ETF 1D (XUIN.L) have volatilities of 5.51% and 5.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAVG.LXUIN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.51%

5.41%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.74%

12.80%

+0.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.28%

15.75%

+1.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.19%

17.13%

+6.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.19%

17.06%

+6.13%

PAVG.L vs. XUIN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAVG.L has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than XUIN.L's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAVG.L vs. XUIN.L - Dividend Comparison

PAVG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than XUIN.L's 0.89% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
PAVG.L
Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.21%0.43%0.41%0.31%0.58%
XUIN.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Industrials UCITS ETF 1D
0.89%1.01%1.12%1.17%0.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAVG.L and XUIN.L have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XUIN.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUIN.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for PAVG.L.

PAVG.L tracks Indxx U.S. Infrastructure Development v2 Index, while XUIN.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Global X and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for PAVG.L and 0.12% for XUIN.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAVG.L and XUIN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer