PAVG.L vs. SILG.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

PAVG.L (Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF USD Dis) and SILG.L (Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - PAVG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF USD Dis, while SILG.L is a Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return v2 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PAVG.L returned 20.28%/yr vs 40.55%/yr for SILG.L. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PAVG.L charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SILG.L.

Performance

PAVG.L vs. SILG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF USD Dis (PAVG.L) and Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAVG.L achieves a 15.20% return, which is significantly higher than SILG.L's -8.89% return.

PAVG.L

• 1D: -1.72%
• 1M: -3.88%
• 6M: 10.56%
• YTD: 15.20%
• 1Y: 24.73%
• 3Y*: 20.28%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SILG.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -13.15%
• 6M: -20.45%
• YTD: -8.89%
• 1Y: 58.69%
• 3Y*: 40.55%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAVG.L vs. SILG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
PAVG.L Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF USD Dis	15.20%	12.40%	19.47%	24.53%	3.88%
SILG.L Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating	-8.89%	153.98%	13.53%	-6.34%	-8.01%

Correlation

The correlation between PAVG.L and SILG.L is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2022	0.22

The correlation between PAVG.L and SILG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PAVG.L vs. SILG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAVG.L

PAVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 59
PAVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
PAVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
PAVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 50
PAVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
PAVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 62

SILG.L

SILG.L Risk / Return Rank: 36
SILG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
SILG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
SILG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 36
SILG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
SILG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAVG.L vs. SILG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF USD Dis (PAVG.L) and Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PAVG.L	SILG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.58	1.11	+0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.27	1.65	+0.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.20	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.71	1.55	+1.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.77	3.55	+5.22

PAVG.L vs. SILG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAVG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is higher than the SILG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAVG.L and SILG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PAVG.L vs. SILG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAVG.L drawdown since its inception was -34.28%, smaller than the maximum SILG.L drawdown of -38.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAVG.L and SILG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAVG.L	SILG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.28%	-38.12%	+3.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.14%	-38.12%	+27.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.81%	-38.12%	+9.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.75%	-34.92%	+27.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.99%	-13.02%	+1.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.14%	16.60%	-13.46%

Volatility

PAVG.L vs. SILG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF USD Dis (PAVG.L) is 5.79%, while Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L) has a volatility of 15.47%. This indicates that PAVG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SILG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAVG.L	SILG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.79%	15.47%	-9.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.85%	43.07%	-29.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.53%	53.26%	-35.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.21%	40.31%	-17.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.21%	40.31%	-17.10%

PAVG.L vs. SILG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAVG.L has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than SILG.L's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

PAVG.L vs. SILG.L - Dividend Comparison

PAVG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, while SILG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
PAVG.L Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF USD Dis	0.39%	0.43%	0.41%	0.31%	0.58%
SILG.L Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PAVG.L and SILG.L in my portfolio?

PAVG.L and SILG.L have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PAVG.L or SILG.L?

On fees, PAVG.L is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PAVG.L or SILG.L?

PAVG.L is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SILG.L.

What is the main difference between PAVG.L and SILG.L?

PAVG.L is categorized as Global Equities, while SILG.L is Silver. PAVG.L tracks Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF USD Dis, while SILG.L tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return v2 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for PAVG.L and 0.65% for SILG.L.