PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAVE.L vs. JEDG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAVE.L vs. JEDG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (PAVE.L) and VanEck Space Innovators UCITS ETF (JEDG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PAVE.L is traded in USD, while JEDG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the JEDG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAVE.L achieves a 23.45% return, which is significantly lower than JEDG.L's 32.98% return.


PAVE.L

1D
1.51%
1M
6.95%
YTD
23.45%
6M
22.32%
1Y
40.89%
3Y*
26.21%
5Y*
10Y*

JEDG.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-33.97%
YTD
32.98%
6M
28.24%
1Y
98.16%
3Y*
56.01%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAVE.L vs. JEDG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
PAVE.L
Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
23.45%19.81%17.96%31.55%18.93%
JEDG.L
VanEck Space Innovators UCITS ETF
32.98%93.99%43.70%12.05%-12.92%

Correlation

The correlation between PAVE.L and JEDG.L is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2022

0.55

The correlation between PAVE.L and JEDG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAVE.L vs. JEDG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAVE.L
PAVE.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
PAVE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAVE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAVE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
PAVE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAVE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

JEDG.L
JEDG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
JEDG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEDG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEDG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
JEDG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEDG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAVE.L vs. JEDG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (PAVE.L) and VanEck Space Innovators UCITS ETF (JEDG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PAVE.LJEDG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.33

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

2.86

+0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.34

9.82

+2.52

PAVE.L vs. JEDG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAVE.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the JEDG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAVE.L and JEDG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PAVE.L vs. JEDG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAVE.L drawdown since its inception was -27.10%, smaller than the maximum JEDG.L drawdown of -34.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAVE.L and JEDG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAVE.LJEDG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.10%

-34.47%

+7.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.77%

-34.47%

+22.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.10%

-34.47%

+7.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-34.47%

+34.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.86%

-9.05%

+3.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

10.03%

-6.72%

Volatility

PAVE.L vs. JEDG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (PAVE.L) is 5.43%, while VanEck Space Innovators UCITS ETF (JEDG.L) has a volatility of 16.19%. This indicates that PAVE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JEDG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAVE.LJEDG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.43%

16.19%

-10.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.77%

37.27%

-22.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.58%

47.18%

-28.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.69%

35.02%

-13.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.69%

35.02%

-13.33%

PAVE.L vs. JEDG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAVE.L has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than JEDG.L's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAVE.L vs. JEDG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither PAVE.L nor JEDG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


PAVE.L and JEDG.L have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PAVE.L is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PAVE.L is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for JEDG.L.

PAVE.L tracks Indxx U.S. Infrastructure Development v2 Index, while JEDG.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for PAVE.L and 0.55% for JEDG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAVE.L and JEDG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer