PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAVE.L vs. BRIP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAVE.L vs. BRIP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (PAVE.L) and Global X European Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (BRIP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PAVE.L is traded in USD, while BRIP.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the BRIP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAVE.L achieves a 23.45% return, which is significantly higher than BRIP.L's 5.84% return.


PAVE.L

1D
1.51%
1M
6.95%
YTD
23.45%
6M
22.32%
1Y
40.89%
3Y*
26.21%
5Y*
10Y*

BRIP.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.22%
YTD
5.84%
6M
5.73%
1Y
11.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAVE.L vs. BRIP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PAVE.L and BRIP.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2024

0.47

The correlation between PAVE.L and BRIP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAVE.L vs. BRIP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAVE.L
PAVE.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
PAVE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAVE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAVE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
PAVE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAVE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

BRIP.L
BRIP.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
BRIP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRIP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRIP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
BRIP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRIP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAVE.L vs. BRIP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (PAVE.L) and Global X European Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (BRIP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PAVE.LBRIP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.14

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

1.05

+2.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.34

2.93

+9.41

PAVE.L vs. BRIP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAVE.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is higher than the BRIP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAVE.L and BRIP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PAVE.L vs. BRIP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAVE.L drawdown since its inception was -27.10%, which is greater than BRIP.L's maximum drawdown of -14.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAVE.L and BRIP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAVE.LBRIP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.10%

-14.25%

-12.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.77%

-11.46%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.63%

+6.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.86%

-3.77%

-2.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

4.11%

-0.80%

Volatility

PAVE.L vs. BRIP.L - Volatility Comparison

Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (PAVE.L) has a higher volatility of 5.43% compared to Global X European Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (BRIP.L) at 4.00%. This indicates that PAVE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRIP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAVE.LBRIP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.43%

4.00%

+1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.77%

14.01%

+0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.58%

16.75%

+1.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.69%

17.78%

+3.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.69%

17.78%

+3.91%

PAVE.L vs. BRIP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PAVE.L and BRIP.L have an expense ratio of 0.47%.


Dividends

PAVE.L vs. BRIP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither PAVE.L nor BRIP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


PAVE.L and BRIP.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.47% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PAVE.L and BRIP.L have the same expense ratio: 0.47% per year.

PAVE.L tracks Indxx U.S. Infrastructure Development v2 Index, while BRIP.L tracks Mirae Asset European Infrastructure Development Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAVE.L and BRIP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer