PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAULX vs. FSKAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAULX vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price U.S. Large-Cap Core Fund (PAULX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAULX achieves a 8.96% return, which is significantly lower than FSKAX's 12.08% return. Over the past 10 years, PAULX has underperformed FSKAX with an annualized return of 13.25%, while FSKAX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.09% annualized return.


PAULX

1D
0.34%
1M
3.41%
YTD
8.96%
6M
8.59%
1Y
20.06%
3Y*
19.40%
5Y*
11.62%
10Y*
13.25%

FSKAX

1D
0.24%
1M
5.80%
YTD
12.08%
6M
11.98%
1Y
29.13%
3Y*
22.42%
5Y*
13.08%
10Y*
15.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAULX vs. FSKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAULX
T. Rowe Price U.S. Large-Cap Core Fund
8.96%12.43%22.59%22.23%-15.42%25.18%15.25%29.16%-3.65%20.22%
FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund
12.08%17.06%23.89%26.12%-19.53%25.66%20.79%30.92%-5.32%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between PAULX and FSKAX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011

0.96

The correlation between PAULX and FSKAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAULX vs. FSKAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAULX
PAULX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
PAULX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAULX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAULX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
PAULX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAULX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

FSKAX
FSKAX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FSKAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSKAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSKAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FSKAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSKAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAULX vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price U.S. Large-Cap Core Fund (PAULX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PAULXFSKAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.44

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

3.38

-0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.83

15.52

-4.69

PAULX vs. FSKAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAULX Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the FSKAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAULX and FSKAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAULXFSKAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

2.46

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.76

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.82

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.85

+0.01

Drawdowns

PAULX vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAULX drawdown since its inception was -33.69%, roughly equal to the maximum FSKAX drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAULX and FSKAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAULXFSKAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.69%

-35.01%

+1.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.61%

-8.92%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.33%

-19.43%

+2.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.11%

-25.39%

+2.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.69%

-35.01%

+1.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-4.02%

+0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

1.94%

-0.04%

Volatility

PAULX vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price U.S. Large-Cap Core Fund (PAULX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) have volatilities of 2.96% and 2.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAULXFSKAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.96%

2.97%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.41%

9.23%

-0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.98%

12.26%

-1.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.97%

17.41%

-1.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.98%

18.46%

-1.48%

PAULX vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAULX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAULX vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison

PAULX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.79%, more than FSKAX's 0.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund
0.93%1.01%1.19%1.41%1.62%1.15%1.45%1.94%2.54%2.07%2.43%0.82%
PAULX
T. Rowe Price U.S. Large-Cap Core Fund
6.79%7.40%6.30%0.16%4.05%6.85%0.59%3.21%7.52%2.10%0.59%5.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, PAULX and FSKAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSKAX has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to PAULX (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAULX dropped -33.69% vs FSKAX's -35.01%.

FSKAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAULX and FSKAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer