PASG vs. TSCDY
PASG (Passage Bio, Inc.) and TSCDY (Tesco PLC) are both stocks. PASG operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while TSCDY operates in Grocery Stores (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, PASG returned -54.00%/yr vs 18.65%/yr for TSCDY. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PASG vs. TSCDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PASG achieves a -50.76% return, which is significantly lower than TSCDY's 7.95% return.
PASG
- 1D
- 3.75%
- 1M
- 5.25%
- YTD
- -50.76%
- 6M
- -40.68%
- 1Y
- -32.71%
- 3Y*
- -32.32%
- 5Y*
- -54.00%
- 10Y*
- —
TSCDY
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 3.36%
- YTD
- 7.95%
- 6M
- 8.80%
- 1Y
- 20.92%
- 3Y*
- 29.19%
- 5Y*
- 18.65%
- 10Y*
- 18.35%
PASG vs. TSCDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PASG Passage Bio, Inc. | -50.76% | 4.04% | -43.85% | -26.81% | -78.27% | -75.17% | 14.82% |
TSCDY Tesco PLC | 7.95% | 32.85% | 30.49% | 43.52% | -29.02% | 65.48% | 14.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between PASG and TSCDY is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2020 | 0.05 |
Fundamentals
PASG:
$18.63M
TSCDY:
$40.34B
PASG:
-$11.85
TSCDY:
£1.61
PASG:
1.58
TSCDY:
2.62
PASG:
$0.00
TSCDY:
£143.57B
PASG:
-$377.00K
TSCDY:
£10.62B
PASG:
-$35.03M
TSCDY:
£9.46B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PASG vs. TSCDY — Risk / Return Rank
PASG
TSCDY
PASG vs. TSCDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Passage Bio, Inc. (PASG) and Tesco PLC (TSCDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PASG | TSCDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.17 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | 1.59 | -2.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.77 | 3.83 | -4.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PASG vs. TSCDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PASG drawdown since its inception was -99.43%, which is greater than TSCDY's maximum drawdown of -76.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PASG and TSCDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PASG | TSCDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.43% | -76.10% | -23.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -79.45% | -13.25% | -66.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -88.21% | -18.37% | -69.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.69% | -45.56% | -53.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.19% | -5.08% | -94.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.82% | -42.81% | -40.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.35% | 5.47% | +36.88% |
Volatility
PASG vs. TSCDY - Volatility Comparison
Passage Bio, Inc. (PASG) has a higher volatility of 17.49% compared to Tesco PLC (TSCDY) at 7.58%. This indicates that PASG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSCDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PASG | TSCDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.49% | 7.58% | +9.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 100.45% | 17.99% | +82.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 122.61% | 22.62% | +99.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 100.91% | 23.26% | +77.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 99.26% | 27.83% | +71.43% |
Dividends
PASG vs. TSCDY - Dividend Comparison
PASG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSCDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PASG Passage Bio, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSCDY Tesco PLC | 2.80% | 3.08% | 3.39% | 3.60% | 5.27% | 20.15% | 3.79% | 2.56% | 2.05% | 0.47% |
Financials
PASG vs. TSCDY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Passage Bio, Inc. and Tesco PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PASG and TSCDY have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PASG has higher volatility (17.49%) compared to TSCDY (7.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PASG dropped -99.43% vs TSCDY's -76.10%.
TSCDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PASG and TSCDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer