PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAPR vs. EAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PAPR vs. EAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April (PAPR) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PAPR vs. EAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PAPR
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April
1.74%6.58%12.28%16.45%-4.29%6.08%
EAPR
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April
0.61%14.80%2.86%8.19%-5.01%-2.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAPR achieves a 1.74% return, which is significantly higher than EAPR's 0.61% return.


PAPR

1D
0.45%
1M
0.61%
YTD
1.74%
6M
3.75%
1Y
11.61%
3Y*
10.62%
5Y*
7.56%
10Y*

EAPR

1D
-0.97%
1M
-0.66%
YTD
0.61%
6M
2.49%
1Y
12.59%
3Y*
6.93%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PAPR vs. EAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAPR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than EAPR's 0.89% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PAPR vs. EAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAPR
PAPR Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
PAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

EAPR
EAPR Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
EAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
EAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAPR vs. EAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April (PAPR) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PAPREAPRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.36

1.64

-0.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.06

2.39

-0.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.46

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

1.77

-0.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.88

13.21

-1.33

PAPR vs. EAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAPR Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the EAPR Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAPR and EAPR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAPREAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

1.64

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.36

+0.40

Correlation

The correlation between PAPR and EAPR is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

PAPR vs. EAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither PAPR nor EAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
PAPR
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.07%
EAPR
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PAPR vs. EAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAPR drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, smaller than the maximum EAPR drawdown of -17.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAPR and EAPR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PAPREAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.31%

-17.65%

+2.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.26%

-6.99%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.97%

+0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.61%

-4.18%

+2.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

0.94%

+0.10%

Volatility

PAPR vs. EAPR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April (PAPR) is 1.01%, while Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR) has a volatility of 1.23%. This indicates that PAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PAPREAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.01%

1.23%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.04%

2.42%

-0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.62%

7.73%

+0.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.23%

9.82%

-1.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.53%

9.82%

-0.29%