PAPR vs. BUFF
PAPR (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April) and BUFF (Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator - PAPR tracks the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect April Series Index while BUFF tracks the Refinitiv Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PAPR returned 8.37%/yr vs 8.71%/yr for BUFF. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PAPR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for BUFF.
Performance
PAPR vs. BUFF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAPR achieves a 7.72% return, which is significantly higher than BUFF's 5.42% return.
PAPR
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 7.72%
- 6M
- 8.40%
- 1Y
- 14.95%
- 3Y*
- 11.66%
- 5Y*
- 8.37%
- 10Y*
- —
BUFF
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- YTD
- 5.42%
- 6M
- 5.90%
- 1Y
- 14.36%
- 3Y*
- 12.47%
- 5Y*
- 8.71%
- 10Y*
- —
PAPR vs. BUFF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April | 7.72% | 6.58% | 12.28% | 16.45% | -4.29% | 7.51% | 4.62% | 6.47% |
BUFF Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF | 5.42% | 11.02% | 12.05% | 16.51% | -4.44% | 8.37% | -12.08% | 16.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAPR and BUFF is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2019 | 0.80 |
The correlation between PAPR and BUFF shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PAPR vs. BUFF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PAPR
BUFF
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
PAPR
BUFF
Financial Services
PAPR
BUFF
Communication Services
PAPR
BUFF
Consumer Cyclical
PAPR
BUFF
Healthcare
PAPR
BUFF
Industrials
PAPR
BUFF
Consumer Defensive
PAPR
BUFF
Energy
PAPR
BUFF
Utilities
PAPR
BUFF
Real Estate
PAPR
BUFF
Basic Materials
PAPR
BUFF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAPR vs. BUFF — Risk / Return Rank
PAPR
BUFF
PAPR vs. BUFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April (PAPR) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PAPR | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.56 | 2.80 | +1.76 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 8.35 | 4.24 | +4.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.12 | 1.58 | +0.54 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 18.05 | 4.02 | +14.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 82.05 | 21.50 | +60.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PAPR | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.56 | 2.80 | +1.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | 1.04 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.49 | +0.34 |
Drawdowns
PAPR vs. BUFF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAPR drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, smaller than the maximum BUFF drawdown of -46.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAPR and BUFF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAPR | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.31% | -46.23% | +30.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.83% | -3.58% | +2.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.87% | -10.24% | -1.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.87% | -10.24% | -1.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | -0.27% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.57% | -6.18% | +4.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.18% | 0.67% | -0.49% |
Volatility
PAPR vs. BUFF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April (PAPR) is 0.86%, while Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) has a volatility of 1.02%. This indicates that PAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAPR | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.86% | 1.02% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.46% | 3.83% | -1.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.29% | 5.15% | -1.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.21% | 8.41% | -0.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.44% | 17.67% | -8.23% |
PAPR vs. BUFF - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAPR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFF's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
PAPR vs. BUFF - Dividend Comparison
Neither PAPR nor BUFF has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFF Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.78% | 1.26% | 1.74% | 1.55% | 0.18% |
PAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PAPR and BUFF have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BUFF has higher volatility (1.02%) compared to PAPR (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAPR dropped -15.31% vs BUFF's -46.23%.
On 5-year performance, BUFF leads with 8.71% vs 8.37% for PAPR. On fees, PAPR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, PAPR has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BUFF has performed better with a 8.71% return vs 8.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PAPR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for BUFF.
PAPR and BUFF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
PAPR tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect April Series Index, while BUFF tracks Refinitiv Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for PAPR and 0.89% for BUFF.
PAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.56 vs 2.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PAPR and BUFF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer