PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAMFX vs. LSMSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAMFX vs. LSMSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Pennsylvania Municipal Inc Fd (PAMFX) and Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAMFX achieves a 2.49% return, which is significantly lower than LSMSX's 2.85% return.


PAMFX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.78%
6M
2.49%
YTD
2.49%
1Y
6.90%
3Y*
3.40%
5Y*
0.66%
10Y*
1.72%

LSMSX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.66%
6M
2.85%
YTD
2.85%
1Y
8.02%
3Y*
4.12%
5Y*
1.22%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAMFX vs. LSMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAMFX
Federated Hermes Pennsylvania Municipal Inc Fd
2.49%2.84%1.89%5.50%-9.06%1.92%4.17%7.21%0.54%4.40%
LSMSX
Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund
2.85%3.22%2.22%7.96%-10.03%4.11%4.48%8.16%0.46%4.92%

Correlation

The correlation between PAMFX and LSMSX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017

0.81

The correlation between PAMFX and LSMSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAMFX vs. LSMSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAMFX
PAMFX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
PAMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
PAMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

LSMSX
LSMSX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
LSMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
LSMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAMFX vs. LSMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Pennsylvania Municipal Inc Fd (PAMFX) and Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PAMFXLSMSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.77

1.70

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.94

2.81

+1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.42

9.45

+4.97

PAMFX vs. LSMSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAMFX Sharpe Ratio is 3.02, which is comparable to the LSMSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAMFX and LSMSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PAMFX vs. LSMSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAMFX drawdown since its inception was -15.50%, roughly equal to the maximum LSMSX drawdown of -15.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAMFX and LSMSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAMFXLSMSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.50%

-15.00%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.11%

-2.82%

+0.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.13%

-7.49%

+1.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.32%

-15.00%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-0.10%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.90%

-2.83%

+0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.56%

0.84%

-0.28%

Volatility

PAMFX vs. LSMSX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes Pennsylvania Municipal Inc Fd (PAMFX) has a higher volatility of 0.47% compared to Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX) at 0.43%. This indicates that PAMFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAMFXLSMSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.47%

0.43%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.76%

2.07%

-0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.76%

2.82%

-0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.02%

4.48%

-0.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.77%

4.49%

-0.72%

PAMFX vs. LSMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAMFX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than LSMSX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAMFX vs. LSMSX - Dividend Comparison

PAMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, less than LSMSX's 3.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSMSX
Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund
3.82%3.83%4.30%3.37%2.38%2.73%2.33%2.55%2.34%0.90%0.00%0.00%
PAMFX
Federated Hermes Pennsylvania Municipal Inc Fd
3.08%3.06%2.99%2.79%2.51%2.45%2.33%3.81%3.15%2.98%3.07%3.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAMFX and LSMSX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PAMFX has higher volatility (0.47%) compared to LSMSX (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAMFX dropped -15.50% vs LSMSX's -15.00%.

PAMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAMFX and LSMSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer