PAMFX vs. LSMSX
PAMFX (Federated Hermes Pennsylvania Municipal Inc Fd) and LSMSX (Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, PAMFX returned 0.66%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for LSMSX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PAMFX charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for LSMSX.
Performance
PAMFX vs. LSMSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAMFX achieves a 2.49% return, which is significantly lower than LSMSX's 2.85% return.
PAMFX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- 6M
- 2.49%
- YTD
- 2.49%
- 1Y
- 6.90%
- 3Y*
- 3.40%
- 5Y*
- 0.66%
- 10Y*
- 1.72%
LSMSX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- 6M
- 2.85%
- YTD
- 2.85%
- 1Y
- 8.02%
- 3Y*
- 4.12%
- 5Y*
- 1.22%
- 10Y*
- —
PAMFX vs. LSMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAMFX Federated Hermes Pennsylvania Municipal Inc Fd | 2.49% | 2.84% | 1.89% | 5.50% | -9.06% | 1.92% | 4.17% | 7.21% | 0.54% | 4.40% |
LSMSX Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund | 2.85% | 3.22% | 2.22% | 7.96% | -10.03% | 4.11% | 4.48% | 8.16% | 0.46% | 4.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAMFX and LSMSX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017 | 0.81 |
The correlation between PAMFX and LSMSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAMFX vs. LSMSX — Risk / Return Rank
PAMFX
LSMSX
PAMFX vs. LSMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Pennsylvania Municipal Inc Fd (PAMFX) and Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PAMFX | LSMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.77 | 1.70 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.94 | 2.81 | +1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.42 | 9.45 | +4.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PAMFX vs. LSMSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAMFX drawdown since its inception was -15.50%, roughly equal to the maximum LSMSX drawdown of -15.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAMFX and LSMSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAMFX | LSMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.50% | -15.00% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.11% | -2.82% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.13% | -7.49% | +1.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.32% | -15.00% | +1.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -0.10% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.90% | -2.83% | +0.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.56% | 0.84% | -0.28% |
Volatility
PAMFX vs. LSMSX - Volatility Comparison
Federated Hermes Pennsylvania Municipal Inc Fd (PAMFX) has a higher volatility of 0.47% compared to Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX) at 0.43%. This indicates that PAMFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAMFX | LSMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.47% | 0.43% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.76% | 2.07% | -0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.76% | 2.82% | -0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.02% | 4.48% | -0.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.77% | 4.49% | -0.72% |
PAMFX vs. LSMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAMFX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than LSMSX's 0.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
PAMFX vs. LSMSX - Dividend Comparison
PAMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, less than LSMSX's 3.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSMSX Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund | 3.82% | 3.83% | 4.30% | 3.37% | 2.38% | 2.73% | 2.33% | 2.55% | 2.34% | 0.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PAMFX Federated Hermes Pennsylvania Municipal Inc Fd | 3.08% | 3.06% | 2.99% | 2.79% | 2.51% | 2.45% | 2.33% | 3.81% | 3.15% | 2.98% | 3.07% | 3.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PAMFX and LSMSX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PAMFX has higher volatility (0.47%) compared to LSMSX (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAMFX dropped -15.50% vs LSMSX's -15.00%.
PAMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PAMFX and LSMSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer