PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PALAX vs. DRMCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PALAX vs. DRMCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Global Allocation Fund (PALAX) and Virtus Mid-Cap Growth Fund (DRMCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PALAX achieves a 9.40% return, which is significantly lower than DRMCX's 15.08% return. Over the past 10 years, PALAX has underperformed DRMCX with an annualized return of 7.56%, while DRMCX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.99% annualized return.


PALAX

1D
0.33%
1M
3.18%
YTD
9.40%
6M
10.71%
1Y
22.97%
3Y*
12.91%
5Y*
6.33%
10Y*
7.56%

DRMCX

1D
0.59%
1M
8.02%
YTD
15.08%
6M
12.70%
1Y
23.31%
3Y*
23.04%
5Y*
8.50%
10Y*
14.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PALAX vs. DRMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PALAX
Virtus Global Allocation Fund
9.40%17.73%6.39%11.78%-15.69%10.82%13.99%17.93%-8.72%16.92%
DRMCX
Virtus Mid-Cap Growth Fund
15.08%18.09%20.49%24.81%-32.59%14.91%55.27%41.73%-11.16%25.08%

Correlation

The correlation between PALAX and DRMCX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 1998

0.85

The correlation between PALAX and DRMCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PALAX vs. DRMCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PALAX
PALAX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
PALAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PALAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
PALAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
PALAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
PALAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

DRMCX
DRMCX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
DRMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
DRMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PALAX vs. DRMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Global Allocation Fund (PALAX) and Virtus Mid-Cap Growth Fund (DRMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PALAXDRMCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.73

1.31

+1.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.81

1.91

+1.90

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.23

+0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

1.81

+1.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.52

6.39

+8.13

PALAX vs. DRMCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PALAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is higher than the DRMCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PALAX and DRMCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PALAXDRMCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73

1.31

+1.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.36

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.64

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.32

+0.20

Drawdowns

PALAX vs. DRMCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PALAX drawdown since its inception was -44.59%, smaller than the maximum DRMCX drawdown of -67.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PALAX and DRMCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PALAXDRMCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.59%

-67.97%

+23.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.93%

-13.75%

+6.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.92%

-26.83%

+14.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.75%

-43.47%

+15.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.75%

-43.47%

+15.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.70%

-22.10%

+15.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

3.90%

-2.29%

Volatility

PALAX vs. DRMCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus Global Allocation Fund (PALAX) is 2.67%, while Virtus Mid-Cap Growth Fund (DRMCX) has a volatility of 5.07%. This indicates that PALAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PALAXDRMCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

5.07%

-2.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.97%

14.97%

-8.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.57%

18.99%

-10.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.85%

24.04%

-12.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.35%

23.60%

-12.25%

PALAX vs. DRMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PALAX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than DRMCX's 0.83% expense ratio.


Dividends

PALAX vs. DRMCX - Dividend Comparison

PALAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.33%, less than DRMCX's 14.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRMCX
Virtus Mid-Cap Growth Fund
14.37%16.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%27.44%9.02%4.12%14.34%8.78%7.35%5.65%
PALAX
Virtus Global Allocation Fund
8.33%6.94%3.07%2.60%6.29%9.15%6.14%10.09%6.19%10.69%1.61%5.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


PALAX and DRMCX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRMCX has higher volatility (5.07%) compared to PALAX (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PALAX dropped -44.59% vs DRMCX's -67.97%.

PALAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PALAX and DRMCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer