PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAJS.L vs. N4US.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAJS.L vs. N4US.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc (PAJS.L) and Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (N4US.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PAJS.L is traded in GBp, while N4US.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the N4US.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAJS.L achieves a 10,553.75% return, which is significantly higher than N4US.L's 18.97% return.


PAJS.L

1D
-0.89%
1M
-4.13%
6M
2.64%
YTD
10,553.75%
1Y
11,697.96%
3Y*
8.41%
5Y*
10Y*

N4US.L

1D
-1.85%
1M
-3.94%
6M
10.74%
YTD
18.97%
1Y
45.07%
3Y*
26.16%
5Y*
22.44%
10Y*
16.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAJS.L vs. N4US.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PAJS.L
Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc
10,553.75%-98.87%0.76%8.67%-13.67%-28.63%
N4US.L
Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc)
18.97%20.97%25.93%29.18%10.71%0.38%

Correlation

The correlation between PAJS.L and N4US.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2021

0.67

The correlation between PAJS.L and N4US.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAJS.L vs. N4US.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAJS.L
PAJS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
PAJS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAJS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAJS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
PAJS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAJS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

N4US.L
N4US.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
N4US.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
N4US.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
N4US.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
N4US.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
N4US.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAJS.L vs. N4US.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc (PAJS.L) and Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (N4US.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PAJS.LN4US.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+279.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

89.43

1.40

+88.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.20

5.23

-5.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.44

16.75

-16.31

PAJS.L vs. N4US.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAJS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.00, which is lower than the N4US.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAJS.L and N4US.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PAJS.L vs. N4US.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAJS.L drawdown since its inception was -99.32%, which is greater than N4US.L's maximum drawdown of -28.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAJS.L and N4US.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAJS.LN4US.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.32%

-28.61%

-70.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-99.06%

-8.58%

-90.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.06%

-20.94%

-78.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.60%

-5.90%

-12.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.69%

-5.12%

-30.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

48.78%

2.68%

+46.10%

Volatility

PAJS.L vs. N4US.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc (PAJS.L) has a higher volatility of 7.44% compared to Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (N4US.L) at 6.00%. This indicates that PAJS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than N4US.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAJS.LN4US.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.44%

6.00%

+1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1,130.17%

15.65%

+1,114.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27,873.20%

19.76%

+27,853.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13,113.62%

19.07%

+13,094.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13,113.62%

19.47%

+13,094.15%

PAJS.L vs. N4US.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PAJS.L and N4US.L have an expense ratio of 0.19%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PAJS.L vs. N4US.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither PAJS.L nor N4US.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


PAJS.L and N4US.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.19% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PAJS.L and N4US.L have the same expense ratio: 0.19% per year.

PAJS.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while N4US.L tracks JPX-Nikkei 400 USD Hedged Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAJS.L and N4US.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer