PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAJS.L vs. IAPD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAJS.L vs. IAPD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc (PAJS.L) and iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS (IAPD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAJS.L achieves a 10,891.43% return, which is significantly higher than IAPD.L's 14.62% return.


PAJS.L

1D
0.90%
1M
0.76%
6M
5.25%
YTD
10,891.43%
1Y
23.35%
3Y*
9.52%
5Y*
10Y*

IAPD.L

1D
0.00%
1M
1.51%
6M
10.11%
YTD
14.62%
1Y
31.27%
3Y*
19.11%
5Y*
11.12%
10Y*
6.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAJS.L vs. IAPD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PAJS.L
Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc
10,891.43%-98.87%0.76%8.67%-13.67%-28.63%
IAPD.L
iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS
14.62%20.92%7.89%7.23%9.69%0.62%

Correlation

The correlation between PAJS.L and IAPD.L is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2021

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAJS.L vs. IAPD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAJS.L
PAJS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
PAJS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAJS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAJS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
PAJS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAJS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

IAPD.L
IAPD.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
IAPD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAPD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAPD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
IAPD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAPD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAJS.L vs. IAPD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc (PAJS.L) and iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS (IAPD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PAJS.LIAPD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+278.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

89.67

1.52

+88.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.23

4.49

-4.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.47

12.47

-12.00

PAJS.L vs. IAPD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAJS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.00, which is lower than the IAPD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAJS.L and IAPD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PAJS.L vs. IAPD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAJS.L drawdown since its inception was -99.32%, which is greater than IAPD.L's maximum drawdown of -56.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAJS.L and IAPD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAJS.LIAPD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.32%

-56.01%

-43.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-99.06%

-6.93%

-92.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.06%

-16.92%

-82.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.02%

-1.69%

-14.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.72%

-8.66%

-27.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

48.77%

2.50%

+46.27%

Volatility

PAJS.L vs. IAPD.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc (PAJS.L) has a higher volatility of 7.24% compared to iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS (IAPD.L) at 2.70%. This indicates that PAJS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAPD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAJS.LIAPD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.24%

2.70%

+4.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1,130.17%

8.55%

+1,121.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27,873.17%

10.83%

+27,862.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13,124.87%

12.47%

+13,112.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13,124.87%

15.39%

+13,109.48%

PAJS.L vs. IAPD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAJS.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than IAPD.L's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAJS.L vs. IAPD.L - Dividend Comparison

PAJS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IAPD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IAPD.L
iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS
4.16%4.20%5.25%5.77%6.84%5.51%3.70%5.67%5.87%4.71%4.22%5.31%
PAJS.L
Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAJS.L and IAPD.L have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PAJS.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PAJS.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IAPD.L.

PAJS.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while IAPD.L is Asia Pacific Equities. PAJS.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while IAPD.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pacific NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for PAJS.L and 0.59% for IAPD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAJS.L and IAPD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer