PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAJS.L vs. HPJS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAJS.L vs. HPJS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc (PAJS.L) and HSBC MSCI Japan Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (HPJS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PAJS.L is traded in GBp, while HPJS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HPJS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAJS.L achieves a 7.24% return, which is significantly lower than HPJS.L's 8.46% return.


PAJS.L

1D
-0.95%
1M
1.09%
YTD
7.24%
6M
5.38%
1Y
20.25%
3Y*
6.52%
5Y*
10Y*

HPJS.L

1D
-1.17%
1M
0.61%
YTD
8.46%
6M
6.90%
1Y
25.79%
3Y*
7.09%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAJS.L vs. HPJS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PAJS.L
Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc
7.24%13.24%0.76%8.67%-14.19%-3.23%
HPJS.L
HSBC MSCI Japan Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF
8.46%14.99%-1.51%9.90%-15.00%-3.49%

Correlation

The correlation between PAJS.L and HPJS.L is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2021

0.97

The correlation between PAJS.L and HPJS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAJS.L vs. HPJS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAJS.L
PAJS.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
PAJS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAJS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAJS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
PAJS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAJS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

HPJS.L
HPJS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
HPJS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HPJS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
HPJS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
HPJS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
HPJS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAJS.L vs. HPJS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc (PAJS.L) and HSBC MSCI Japan Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (HPJS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PAJS.LHPJS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.25

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

2.04

-0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.02

6.70

-1.67

PAJS.L vs. HPJS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAJS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is comparable to the HPJS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAJS.L and HPJS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAJS.LHPJS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

1.35

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.15

-0.05

Drawdowns

PAJS.L vs. HPJS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAJS.L drawdown since its inception was -29.71%, which is greater than HPJS.L's maximum drawdown of -24.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAJS.L and HPJS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAJS.LHPJS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.71%

-24.65%

-5.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.92%

-12.22%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.71%

-17.24%

-12.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.43%

-1.70%

-5.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.45%

-11.45%

-5.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.84%

3.72%

+0.12%

Volatility

PAJS.L vs. HPJS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc (PAJS.L) is 4.40%, while HSBC MSCI Japan Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (HPJS.L) has a volatility of 4.72%. This indicates that PAJS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HPJS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAJS.LHPJS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.40%

4.72%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.33%

14.68%

-0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.01%

18.43%

-0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.26%

15.94%

+6.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.26%

15.94%

+6.32%

PAJS.L vs. HPJS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAJS.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than HPJS.L's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PAJS.L vs. HPJS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither PAJS.L nor HPJS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, PAJS.L and HPJS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, HPJS.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HPJS.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for PAJS.L.

Both ETFs track TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for PAJS.L and 0.18% for HPJS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAJS.L and HPJS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer