PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAHRX vs. PADLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAHRX vs. PADLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Target 2015 Fund (PAHRX) and Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PAHRX having a 4.27% return and PADLX slightly lower at 4.09%.


PAHRX

1D
0.66%
1M
-0.33%
6M
2.35%
YTD
4.27%
1Y
9.35%
3Y*
8.49%
5Y*
3.77%
10Y*
5.44%
ALL TIME*
5.32%

PADLX

1D
0.53%
1M
-0.35%
6M
2.77%
YTD
4.09%
1Y
9.96%
3Y*
9.41%
5Y*
3.52%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PAHRX vs. PADLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PAHRX
T. Rowe Price Target 2015 Fund
4.27%10.49%7.36%10.67%-13.16%7.63%11.18%
PADLX
Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund
4.09%10.83%8.34%11.01%-12.54%2.93%7.84%

Correlation

The correlation between PAHRX and PADLX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2020

0.88

The correlation between PAHRX and PADLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAHRX vs. PADLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PAHRX
PAHRX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
PAHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
PAHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

PADLX
PADLX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
PADLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PADLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
PADLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
PADLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
PADLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PAHRX vs. PADLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Target 2015 Fund (PAHRX) and Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PAHRXPADLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.39

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

2.75

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.82

11.56

-2.74

PAHRX vs. PADLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAHRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the PADLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAHRX and PADLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PAHRX vs. PADLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAHRX drawdown since its inception was -18.73%, roughly equal to the maximum PADLX drawdown of -18.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAHRX and PADLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAHRXPADLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.73%

-18.87%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.39%

-3.63%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.06%

-6.63%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.91%

-18.87%

+0.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-0.79%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.88%

-4.73%

+1.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.03%

0.86%

+0.17%

Volatility

PAHRX vs. PADLX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Target 2015 Fund (PAHRX) and Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX) have volatilities of 1.40% and 1.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAHRXPADLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.40%

1.44%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.70%

4.03%

+0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.66%

4.89%

+0.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.73%

6.70%

+0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.87%

7.47%

-0.60%

PAHRX vs. PADLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAHRX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than PADLX's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAHRX vs. PADLX - Dividend Comparison

PAHRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.42%, more than PADLX's 4.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PADLX
Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund
4.65%5.03%3.71%2.91%1.01%1.45%1.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PAHRX
T. Rowe Price Target 2015 Fund
5.42%5.65%5.01%3.49%8.61%6.14%5.78%2.99%4.45%1.88%0.83%0.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, PAHRX and PADLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PADLX has higher volatility (1.44%) compared to PAHRX (1.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAHRX dropped -18.73% vs PADLX's -18.87%.

PADLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAHRX and PADLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer