PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAGRX vs. YFSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAGRX vs. YFSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio (PAGRX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAGRX achieves a 16.20% return, which is significantly lower than YFSIX's 27.94% return.


PAGRX

1D
-0.10%
1M
8.87%
YTD
16.20%
6M
19.31%
1Y
43.21%
3Y*
40.90%
5Y*
19.92%
10Y*
20.75%

YFSIX

1D
-0.24%
1M
5.24%
YTD
27.94%
6M
15.38%
1Y
32.86%
3Y*
17.40%
5Y*
9.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAGRX vs. YFSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAGRX
Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio
16.20%36.92%44.52%38.73%-26.06%24.84%37.65%40.34%-12.41%18.69%
YFSIX
AMG Yacktman Global Fund
27.94%14.91%-0.34%16.64%-9.15%13.13%18.46%24.40%2.18%20.95%

Correlation

The correlation between PAGRX and YFSIX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2017

0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between PAGRX and YFSIX has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAGRX vs. YFSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAGRX
PAGRX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
PAGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
PAGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

YFSIX
YFSIX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
YFSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YFSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
YFSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
YFSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
YFSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAGRX vs. YFSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio (PAGRX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PAGRXYFSIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.64

1.54

+1.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.49

1.70

+1.79

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.37

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.96

2.31

+2.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

21.16

7.30

+13.86

PAGRX vs. YFSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAGRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is higher than the YFSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAGRX and YFSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAGRXYFSIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.64

1.54

+1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.59

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.82

-0.28

Drawdowns

PAGRX vs. YFSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAGRX drawdown since its inception was -55.87%, which is greater than YFSIX's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAGRX and YFSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAGRXYFSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.87%

-35.10%

-20.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.14%

-14.20%

+5.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.34%

-14.20%

-12.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.52%

-25.14%

-11.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-0.24%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.05%

-4.90%

-5.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

4.47%

-2.33%

Volatility

PAGRX vs. YFSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio (PAGRX) is 4.70%, while AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX) has a volatility of 5.82%. This indicates that PAGRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YFSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAGRXYFSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.70%

5.82%

-1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.94%

20.77%

-7.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.17%

21.35%

-4.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.45%

15.39%

+9.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.52%

16.25%

+8.27%

PAGRX vs. YFSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAGRX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than YFSIX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAGRX vs. YFSIX - Dividend Comparison

PAGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, while YFSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PAGRX
Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio
0.03%0.03%5.62%2.72%7.79%6.82%15.08%17.51%12.33%8.70%16.94%6.31%
YFSIX
AMG Yacktman Global Fund
0.00%0.00%8.68%8.02%4.32%8.18%4.76%6.59%0.71%2.63%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAGRX and YFSIX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YFSIX has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to PAGRX (4.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAGRX dropped -55.87% vs YFSIX's -35.10%.

PAGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAGRX and YFSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer