PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAEKX vs. FFSFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAEKX vs. FFSFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Retirement Advantage 2050 Fund (PAEKX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund (FFSFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAEKX achieves a 10.74% return, which is significantly lower than FFSFX's 13.84% return.


PAEKX

1D
0.45%
1M
4.73%
YTD
10.74%
6M
11.67%
1Y
25.86%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
11.51%
10Y*

FFSFX

1D
0.58%
1M
5.11%
YTD
13.84%
6M
15.69%
1Y
31.32%
3Y*
20.72%
5Y*
10.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAEKX vs. FFSFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PAEKX
Putnam Retirement Advantage 2050 Fund
10.74%18.99%13.81%29.68%-17.07%18.57%15.16%
FFSFX
Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund
13.84%23.76%14.01%20.54%-18.28%16.54%17.10%

Correlation

The correlation between PAEKX and FFSFX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2020

0.96

The correlation between PAEKX and FFSFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAEKX vs. FFSFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAEKX
PAEKX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
PAEKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAEKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAEKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
PAEKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAEKX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

FFSFX
FFSFX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FFSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FFSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAEKX vs. FFSFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Retirement Advantage 2050 Fund (PAEKX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund (FFSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PAEKXFFSFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.46

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

3.24

+0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.74

14.44

+1.29

PAEKX vs. FFSFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAEKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the FFSFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAEKX and FFSFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAEKXFFSFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

2.48

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.70

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.78

-0.01

Drawdowns

PAEKX vs. FFSFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAEKX drawdown since its inception was -30.72%, roughly equal to the maximum FFSFX drawdown of -31.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAEKX and FFSFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAEKXFFSFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.72%

-31.03%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.64%

-9.79%

+2.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.90%

-15.43%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.45%

-27.31%

+3.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.33%

-5.90%

+0.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

2.19%

-0.52%

Volatility

PAEKX vs. FFSFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam Retirement Advantage 2050 Fund (PAEKX) is 2.85%, while Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund (FFSFX) has a volatility of 4.28%. This indicates that PAEKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFSFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAEKXFFSFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

4.28%

-1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.05%

10.56%

-2.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.33%

12.79%

-2.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.36%

15.03%

-0.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.98%

17.04%

-0.06%

PAEKX vs. FFSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAEKX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FFSFX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAEKX vs. FFSFX - Dividend Comparison

PAEKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.11%, more than FFSFX's 4.91% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FFSFX
Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund
4.91%3.69%2.29%2.01%8.77%7.81%2.25%1.40%
PAEKX
Putnam Retirement Advantage 2050 Fund
9.11%10.09%5.96%5.08%11.27%17.66%2.17%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, PAEKX and FFSFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FFSFX has higher volatility (4.28%) compared to PAEKX (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAEKX dropped -30.72% vs FFSFX's -31.03%.

PAEKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAEKX and FFSFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer