PAEKX vs. FFSFX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Putnam Retirement Advantage 2050 Fund (PAEKX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund (FFSFX).

PAEKX is managed by Putnam. It was launched on Dec 30, 2019. FFSFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 28, 2019.

Performance

PAEKX vs. FFSFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Retirement Advantage 2050 Fund (PAEKX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund (FFSFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PAEKX vs. FFSFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PAEKX Putnam Retirement Advantage 2050 Fund	-1.48%	18.99%	13.81%	29.68%	-17.07%	18.57%	15.16%
FFSFX Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund	-0.51%	23.76%	14.01%	20.54%	-18.28%	16.54%	17.10%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAEKX achieves a -1.48% return, which is significantly lower than FFSFX's -0.51% return.

PAEKX

• 1D: 2.47%
• 1M: -4.45%
• YTD: -1.48%
• 6M: 1.03%
• 1Y: 18.61%
• 3Y*: 17.53%
• 5Y*: 9.86%
• 10Y*: —

FFSFX

• 1D: 3.09%
• 1M: -5.83%
• YTD: -0.51%
• 6M: 3.00%
• 1Y: 22.48%
• 3Y*: 16.49%
• 5Y*: 8.50%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAEKX vs. FFSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAEKX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FFSFX's 0.75% expense ratio.

FFSFX

Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund

PAEKX

Putnam Retirement Advantage 2050 Fund

Return for Risk

PAEKX vs. FFSFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAEKX

PAEKX Risk / Return Rank: 72
PAEKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
PAEKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
PAEKX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
PAEKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
PAEKX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

FFSFX

FFSFX Risk / Return Rank: 80
FFSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
FFSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
FFSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
FFSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
FFSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAEKX vs. FFSFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Retirement Advantage 2050 Fund (PAEKX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund (FFSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PAEKX	FFSFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.31	1.43	-0.12
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.91	2.04	-0.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.30	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.86	2.04	-0.18
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.05	9.00	+0.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PAEKX vs. FFSFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAEKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the FFSFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAEKX and FFSFX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PAEKX	FFSFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.31	1.43	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69	0.57	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	0.67	0.00

Correlation

The correlation between PAEKX and FFSFX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

PAEKX vs. FFSFX - Dividend Comparison

PAEKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.24%, more than FFSFX's 3.71% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
PAEKX Putnam Retirement Advantage 2050 Fund	10.24%	10.09%	5.96%	5.08%	11.27%	17.66%	2.17%	0.00%
FFSFX Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund	3.71%	3.69%	2.29%	2.01%	8.77%	7.81%	2.25%	1.40%

Drawdowns

PAEKX vs. FFSFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAEKX drawdown since its inception was -30.72%, roughly equal to the maximum FFSFX drawdown of -31.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAEKX and FFSFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAEKX	FFSFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.72%	-31.03%	+0.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.35%	-11.20%	+0.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.45%	-27.31%	+3.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.35%	-7.00%	+1.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.45%	-6.02%	+0.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.13%	2.54%	-0.41%

Volatility

PAEKX vs. FFSFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam Retirement Advantage 2050 Fund (PAEKX) is 4.90%, while Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund (FFSFX) has a volatility of 6.64%. This indicates that PAEKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFSFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAEKX	FFSFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.90%	6.64%	-1.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.20%	10.01%	-1.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.66%	16.24%	-1.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.37%	14.91%	-0.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.12%	17.08%	+0.04%