PAEEM.PA vs. LQQ.PA
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi PEA Emergent (MSCI Emerging) ESG Transition UCITS ETF Acc (PAEEM.PA) and Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage (LQQ.PA).
PAEEM.PA and LQQ.PA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PAEEM.PA is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM ex-Egypt ESG Broad CTB Select Index. It was launched on Jun 6, 2025. LQQ.PA is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq 100® Leverage (2x) index. It was launched on Jun 27, 2006. Both PAEEM.PA and LQQ.PA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
PAEEM.PA vs. LQQ.PA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PAEEM.PA vs. LQQ.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAEEM.PA Amundi PEA Emergent (MSCI Emerging) ESG Transition UCITS ETF Acc | 5.72% | 22.47% | 13.05% | 3.25% | -15.31% | 4.42% | 8.27% | 11.57% |
LQQ.PA Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage | -10.77% | 14.16% | 57.02% | 112.33% | -59.20% | 71.22% | 74.17% | 31.20% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAEEM.PA achieves a 5.72% return, which is significantly higher than LQQ.PA's -10.77% return.
PAEEM.PA
- 1D
- 3.45%
- 1M
- -5.14%
- YTD
- 5.72%
- 6M
- 9.42%
- 1Y
- 24.90%
- 3Y*
- 13.87%
- 5Y*
- 4.38%
- 10Y*
- —
LQQ.PA
- 1D
- 5.92%
- 1M
- -6.08%
- YTD
- -10.77%
- 6M
- -7.37%
- 1Y
- 30.50%
- 3Y*
- 34.50%
- 5Y*
- 16.68%
- 10Y*
- 29.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PAEEM.PA vs. LQQ.PA - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAEEM.PA has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than LQQ.PA's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PAEEM.PA vs. LQQ.PA — Risk / Return Rank
PAEEM.PA
LQQ.PA
PAEEM.PA vs. LQQ.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi PEA Emergent (MSCI Emerging) ESG Transition UCITS ETF Acc (PAEEM.PA) and Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage (LQQ.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PAEEM.PA | LQQ.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.35 | 0.77 | +0.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.87 | 1.27 | +0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.18 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.45 | 2.70 | +0.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.21 | 8.75 | +4.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PAEEM.PA | LQQ.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 0.77 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.41 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.63 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between PAEEM.PA and LQQ.PA is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PAEEM.PA vs. LQQ.PA - Dividend Comparison
Neither PAEEM.PA nor LQQ.PA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
PAEEM.PA vs. LQQ.PA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAEEM.PA drawdown since its inception was -31.94%, smaller than the maximum LQQ.PA drawdown of -75.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAEEM.PA and LQQ.PA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAEEM.PA | LQQ.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.94% | -75.86% | +43.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.29% | -24.34% | +11.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.63% | -61.21% | +37.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.61% | -17.00% | +9.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.84% | -15.84% | +5.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 6.75% | -3.95% |
Volatility
PAEEM.PA vs. LQQ.PA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi PEA Emergent (MSCI Emerging) ESG Transition UCITS ETF Acc (PAEEM.PA) is 7.21%, while Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage (LQQ.PA) has a volatility of 10.87%. This indicates that PAEEM.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQQ.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PAEEM.PA | LQQ.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.21% | 10.87% | -3.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.94% | 23.30% | -10.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.15% | 39.22% | -21.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.45% | 39.75% | -23.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.09% | 38.80% | -19.71% |