PADV.L vs. FRQX.L
PADV.L (SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS) and FRQX.L (Franklin AC Asia ex Japan UCITS ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - PADV.L tracks the MSCI AC Asia Pacific NR USD while FRQX.L tracks the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PADV.L returned 5.22%/yr vs 14.74%/yr for FRQX.L. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PADV.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for FRQX.L.
Performance
PADV.L vs. FRQX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PADV.L achieves a 3.65% return, which is significantly lower than FRQX.L's 43.69% return.
PADV.L
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -0.94%
- YTD
- 3.65%
- 6M
- 0.91%
- 1Y
- 13.55%
- 3Y*
- 10.47%
- 5Y*
- 5.22%
- 10Y*
- 7.74%
FRQX.L
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- 7.41%
- YTD
- 43.69%
- 6M
- 46.47%
- 1Y
- 76.56%
- 3Y*
- 26.02%
- 5Y*
- 14.74%
- 10Y*
- —
PADV.L vs. FRQX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PADV.L SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS | 3.65% | 14.61% | 6.60% | 9.29% | -5.74% | 3.20% | -2.54% | 16.77% | -5.96% |
FRQX.L Franklin AC Asia ex Japan UCITS ETF | 43.69% | 21.13% | 9.39% | 5.79% | -2.53% | 5.94% | 3.15% | 6.30% | -4.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between PADV.L and FRQX.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2018 | 0.68 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PADV.L and FRQX.L has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PADV.L vs. FRQX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PADV.L
FRQX.L
Financial Services
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Communication Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Financial Services
PADV.L
FRQX.L
Utilities
PADV.L
FRQX.L
Consumer Defensive
PADV.L
FRQX.L
Healthcare
PADV.L
FRQX.L
Industrials
PADV.L
FRQX.L
Consumer Cyclical
PADV.L
FRQX.L
Technology
PADV.L
FRQX.L
Communication Services
PADV.L
FRQX.L
Real Estate
PADV.L
FRQX.L
Basic Materials
PADV.L
FRQX.L
Energy
PADV.L
-
FRQX.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PADV.L vs. FRQX.L — Risk / Return Rank
PADV.L
FRQX.L
PADV.L vs. FRQX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (PADV.L) and Franklin AC Asia ex Japan UCITS ETF (FRQX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PADV.L | FRQX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.71 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 5.97 | -4.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.60 | 23.58 | -18.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PADV.L | FRQX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 4.05 | -2.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 1.00 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.65 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
PADV.L vs. FRQX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PADV.L drawdown since its inception was -27.09%, which is greater than FRQX.L's maximum drawdown of -20.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PADV.L and FRQX.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PADV.L | FRQX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.09% | -20.77% | -6.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.01% | -13.07% | +6.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.60% | -19.42% | +8.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.25% | -19.42% | -0.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.84% | -2.56% | -2.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.65% | -3.94% | -1.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.87% | 3.31% | -0.44% |
Volatility
PADV.L vs. FRQX.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (PADV.L) is 2.49%, while Franklin AC Asia ex Japan UCITS ETF (FRQX.L) has a volatility of 7.40%. This indicates that PADV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRQX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PADV.L | FRQX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.49% | 7.40% | -4.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.83% | 16.78% | -7.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.24% | 19.27% | -8.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.03% | 14.77% | -1.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.63% | 16.44% | -1.81% |
PADV.L vs. FRQX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
PADV.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FRQX.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
PADV.L vs. FRQX.L - Dividend Comparison
PADV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, while FRQX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRQX.L Franklin AC Asia ex Japan UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PADV.L SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS | 2.89% | 2.96% | 3.06% | 2.93% | 3.44% | 2.91% | 2.94% | 2.79% | 2.38% | 1.76% | 2.14% | 3.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PADV.L and FRQX.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FRQX.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FRQX.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PADV.L.
PADV.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pacific NR USD, while FRQX.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PADV.L and 0.40% for FRQX.L.
Find the right allocation for PADV.L and FRQX.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer