PADV.L vs. ASDV.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PADV.L (SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS) and ASDV.L (SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds from State Street tracking the MSCI AC Asia Pacific NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PADV.L returned 7.74%/yr vs 7.45%/yr for ASDV.L. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.55% expense ratio.

Performance

PADV.L vs. ASDV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (PADV.L) and SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (ASDV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

PADV.L is traded in GBP, while ASDV.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ASDV.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PADV.L having a 3.65% return and ASDV.L slightly higher at 3.78%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PADV.L having a 7.74% annualized return and ASDV.L not far behind at 7.45%.

PADV.L

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: -0.94%
• YTD: 3.65%
• 6M: 0.91%
• 1Y: 13.55%
• 3Y*: 10.47%
• 5Y*: 5.22%
• 10Y*: 7.74%

ASDV.L

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: 0.35%
• YTD: 3.78%
• 6M: 1.87%
• 1Y: 12.99%
• 3Y*: 10.55%
• 5Y*: 5.25%
• 10Y*: 7.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PADV.L vs. ASDV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PADV.L SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS	3.65%	14.61%	6.60%	9.29%	-5.74%	3.20%	-2.54%	16.77%	-3.74%	18.23%
ASDV.L SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS	3.74%	14.49%	6.67%	9.70%	-5.57%	3.51%	-2.79%	16.05%	-3.63%	18.62%

Correlation

The correlation between PADV.L and ASDV.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2013	0.77

The correlation between PADV.L and ASDV.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (all time) to 0.88 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PADV.L vs. ASDV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PADV.L	ASDV.L
Financial Services	33.0%	33.0%
Utilities	14.9%	14.9%
Consumer Defensive	9.2%	9.2%
Healthcare	8.7%	8.7%
Industrials	7.3%	7.3%
Consumer Cyclical	6.7%	6.7%
Technology	6.7%	6.7%
Communication Services	6.2%	6.2%
Real Estate	4.6%	4.6%
Basic Materials	2.8%	2.8%
Energy	-	-

Return for Risk

PADV.L vs. ASDV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PADV.L

PADV.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
PADV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
PADV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
PADV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 32
PADV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
PADV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 32

ASDV.L

ASDV.L Risk / Return Rank: 30
ASDV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
ASDV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
ASDV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 28
ASDV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
ASDV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PADV.L vs. ASDV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (PADV.L) and SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (ASDV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PADV.L	ASDV.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.17	1.20	-0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.63	1.68	-0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.22	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.87	1.94	-0.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.60	4.84	-0.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PADV.L vs. ASDV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PADV.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the ASDV.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PADV.L and ASDV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PADV.L	ASDV.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.17	1.20	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41	0.39	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	0.50	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.49	-0.05

Drawdowns

PADV.L vs. ASDV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PADV.L drawdown since its inception was -27.09%, roughly equal to the maximum ASDV.L drawdown of -27.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PADV.L and ASDV.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	PADV.L	ASDV.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.09%	-27.03%	-0.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.01%	-6.67%	-0.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.60%	-10.42%	-0.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.25%	-20.03%	-0.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.94%	-25.32%	+0.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.84%	-4.30%	-0.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.65%	-5.60%	-0.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.87%	2.68%	+0.19%

Volatility

PADV.L vs. ASDV.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (PADV.L) is 2.49%, while SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (ASDV.L) has a volatility of 3.42%. This indicates that PADV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASDV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PADV.L	ASDV.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.49%	3.42%	-0.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.83%	8.79%	+0.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.24%	10.75%	+0.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.03%	13.30%	-0.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.63%	14.95%	-0.32%

PADV.L vs. ASDV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PADV.L and ASDV.L have an expense ratio of 0.55%.

Dividends

PADV.L vs. ASDV.L - Dividend Comparison

PADV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, which matches ASDV.L's 2.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASDV.L SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS	2.89%	2.85%	3.11%	2.89%	3.63%	2.98%	2.82%	2.65%	2.52%	1.70%	2.37%	3.24%
PADV.L SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS	2.89%	2.96%	3.06%	2.93%	3.44%	2.91%	2.94%	2.79%	2.38%	1.76%	2.14%	3.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PADV.L and ASDV.L in my portfolio?

PADV.L and ASDV.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PADV.L or ASDV.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.55% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PADV.L or ASDV.L?

PADV.L and ASDV.L have the same expense ratio: 0.55% per year.

What is the main difference between PADV.L and ASDV.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI AC Asia Pacific NR USD.