PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PACW.L vs. INFR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PACW.L vs. INFR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PACW.L is traded in GBP, while INFR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the INFR.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PACW.L achieves a 11.92% return, which is significantly higher than INFR.L's 9.52% return.


PACW.L

1D
-0.04%
1M
5.24%
YTD
11.92%
6M
12.31%
1Y
30.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

INFR.L

1D
-1.24%
1M
-2.23%
YTD
9.52%
6M
8.44%
1Y
16.29%
3Y*
9.33%
5Y*
7.61%
10Y*
8.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PACW.L vs. INFR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PACW.L and INFR.L is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025

0.20

The correlation between PACW.L and INFR.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PACW.L vs. INFR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PACW.L
PACW.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
PACW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PACW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
PACW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
PACW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
PACW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

INFR.L
INFR.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
INFR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INFR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
INFR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
INFR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
INFR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PACW.L vs. INFR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PACW.LINFR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.27

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.27

3.13

+1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.43

7.96

+9.47

PACW.L vs. INFR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PACW.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is higher than the INFR.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PACW.L and INFR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PACW.LINFR.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.89

1.55

+1.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.24

0.52

+0.72

Drawdowns

PACW.L vs. INFR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PACW.L drawdown since its inception was -17.68%, smaller than the maximum INFR.L drawdown of -34.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PACW.L and INFR.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PACW.LINFR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.68%

-34.25%

+16.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.06%

-5.19%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-3.70%

+3.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.02%

-6.12%

+3.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

2.04%

-0.31%

Volatility

PACW.L vs. INFR.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L) is 2.93%, while iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L) has a volatility of 3.92%. This indicates that PACW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INFR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PACW.LINFR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.93%

3.92%

-0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.75%

8.92%

-1.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.42%

10.49%

-0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.91%

12.26%

+1.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.91%

14.10%

-0.19%

PACW.L vs. INFR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PACW.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than INFR.L's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

PACW.L vs. INFR.L - Dividend Comparison

PACW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than INFR.L's 2.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INFR.L
iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.82%2.97%2.96%3.02%2.54%2.60%2.84%2.70%2.99%3.51%3.45%4.75%
PACW.L
Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income
1.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PACW.L and INFR.L have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PACW.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PACW.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for INFR.L.

PACW.L is categorized as Global Equities, while INFR.L is Utilities Equities. PACW.L tracks Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index, while INFR.L tracks FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for PACW.L and 0.65% for INFR.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PACW.L and INFR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer