PACW.L vs. CSH2.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L) and Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP (CSH2.L).
PACW.L and CSH2.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PACW.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. It was launched on Jul 24, 2025. CSH2.L is an actively managed fund by Amundi. It was launched on Mar 2, 2015.
Performance
PACW.L vs. CSH2.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PACW.L vs. CSH2.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PACW.L Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income | -2.55% | 9.58% |
CSH2.L Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP | 0.98% | 4.00% |
Different Trading Currencies
PACW.L is traded in GBP, while CSH2.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CSH2.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PACW.L achieves a -2.55% return, which is significantly lower than CSH2.L's 0.98% return.
PACW.L
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -6.00%
- YTD
- -2.55%
- 6M
- 1.48%
- 1Y
- 17.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSH2.L
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 0.98%
- 6M
- 2.14%
- 1Y
- 4.48%
- 3Y*
- 5.00%
- 5Y*
- 3.51%
- 10Y*
- 2.01%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PACW.L vs. CSH2.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PACW.L and CSH2.L have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
PACW.L vs. CSH2.L — Risk / Return Rank
PACW.L
CSH2.L
PACW.L vs. CSH2.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L) and Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP (CSH2.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PACW.L | CSH2.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.28 | 7.30 | -6.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.76 | 13.63 | -11.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 3.85 | -2.58 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 28.39 | -26.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.89 | 142.15 | -135.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PACW.L | CSH2.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | 7.30 | -6.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 6.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 4.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 4.51 | -4.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between PACW.L and CSH2.L is -0.00. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
PACW.L vs. CSH2.L - Dividend Comparison
PACW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, while CSH2.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | |
|---|---|
PACW.L Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income | 1.42% |
CSH2.L Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PACW.L vs. CSH2.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PACW.L drawdown since its inception was -17.68%, which is greater than CSH2.L's maximum drawdown of -0.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PACW.L and CSH2.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PACW.L | CSH2.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.68% | -0.37% | -17.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.23% | -0.16% | -10.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.00% | 0.00% | -6.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.37% | 0.00% | -3.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.37% | 0.03% | +2.34% |
Volatility
PACW.L vs. CSH2.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L) has a higher volatility of 4.32% compared to Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP (CSH2.L) at 0.08%. This indicates that PACW.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSH2.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PACW.L | CSH2.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.32% | 0.08% | +4.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.17% | 0.37% | +7.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.91% | 0.61% | +13.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.20% | 0.56% | +13.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.20% | 0.44% | +13.76% |