PAC vs. ERAS
PAC (Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.) and ERAS (Erasca, Inc.) are both stocks. PAC operates in Airports & Air Services (Industrials), while ERAS operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 3 years, PAC returned 12.84%/yr vs 68.63%/yr for ERAS. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PAC vs. ERAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAC achieves a -10.14% return, which is significantly lower than ERAS's 277.69% return.
PAC
- 1D
- 3.08%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- YTD
- -10.14%
- 6M
- -8.95%
- 1Y
- 4.13%
- 3Y*
- 12.84%
- 5Y*
- 20.66%
- 10Y*
- 14.31%
ERAS
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 37.34%
- YTD
- 277.69%
- 6M
- 290.28%
- 1Y
- 849.32%
- 3Y*
- 68.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PAC vs. ERAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAC Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. | -10.14% | 56.30% | 4.19% | 28.64% | 9.79% | 30.39% |
ERAS Erasca, Inc. | 277.69% | 48.21% | 17.84% | -50.58% | -72.34% | -2.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAC and ERAS is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2021 | 0.14 |
Fundamentals
PAC:
$11.97B
ERAS:
$4.28B
PAC:
MX$214.01
ERAS:
-$0.96
PAC:
8.03
ERAS:
10.86
PAC:
MX$32.84B
ERAS:
$0.00
PAC:
MX$10.93B
ERAS:
-$743.00K
PAC:
MX$20.54B
ERAS:
-$279.47M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAC vs. ERAS — Risk / Return Rank
PAC
ERAS
PAC vs. ERAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. (PAC) and Erasca, Inc. (ERAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PAC | ERAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -7.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.71 | -0.66 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | 13.90 | -13.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.27 | 43.69 | -43.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PAC vs. ERAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAC drawdown since its inception was -73.20%, smaller than the maximum ERAS drawdown of -95.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAC and ERAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAC | ERAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.20% | -95.65% | +22.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.19% | -59.46% | +33.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.83% | -67.68% | +24.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.14% | -42.28% | +21.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.52% | -74.66% | +58.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.29% | 18.96% | -6.67% |
Volatility
PAC vs. ERAS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. (PAC) is 10.37%, while Erasca, Inc. (ERAS) has a volatility of 20.78%. This indicates that PAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ERAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAC | ERAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.37% | 20.78% | -10.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.96% | 96.05% | -70.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.04% | 104.00% | -72.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.11% | 83.41% | -47.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.51% | 83.41% | -44.90% |
Dividends
PAC vs. ERAS - Dividend Comparison
PAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, while ERAS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERAS Erasca, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PAC Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. | 1.89% | 3.33% | 4.14% | 4.88% | 5.02% | 4.17% | 0.00% | 4.99% | 6.27% | 5.83% | 4.50% | 3.98% |
Financials
PAC vs. ERAS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. and Erasca, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PAC and ERAS have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ERAS has higher volatility (20.78%) compared to PAC (10.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAC dropped -73.20% vs ERAS's -95.65%.
ERAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.95 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PAC and ERAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer