PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAC vs. CNDX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PAC vs. CNDX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. (PAC) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PAC vs. CNDX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAC
Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.
-5.71%56.30%4.19%28.64%9.79%29.95%-6.17%54.36%-15.66%32.15%
CNDX.L
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF
-5.13%19.75%26.45%56.31%-33.45%27.96%48.33%38.07%-1.03%32.36%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAC achieves a -5.71% return, which is significantly lower than CNDX.L's -5.13% return. Over the past 10 years, PAC has underperformed CNDX.L with an annualized return of 16.00%, while CNDX.L has yielded a comparatively higher 18.90% annualized return.


PAC

1D
0.69%
1M
-2.55%
YTD
-5.71%
6M
6.94%
1Y
36.99%
3Y*
13.34%
5Y*
23.68%
10Y*
16.00%

CNDX.L

1D
3.32%
1M
-2.99%
YTD
-5.13%
6M
-2.25%
1Y
24.64%
3Y*
23.05%
5Y*
13.06%
10Y*
18.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAC vs. CNDX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAC
PAC Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
PAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAC Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
PAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAC Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

CNDX.L
CNDX.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
CNDX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNDX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNDX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
CNDX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNDX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAC vs. CNDX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. (PAC) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PACCNDX.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.21

1.24

-0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.75

1.83

-0.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.25

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

3.26

-1.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.26

12.14

-7.88

PAC vs. CNDX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAC Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the CNDX.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAC and CNDX.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PACCNDX.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

1.24

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.62

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.94

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

1.03

-0.56

Correlation

The correlation between PAC and CNDX.L is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

PAC vs. CNDX.L - Dividend Comparison

PAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, while CNDX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PAC
Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.
3.54%3.33%4.14%4.88%5.02%4.17%0.00%4.99%6.27%5.83%4.50%3.98%
CNDX.L
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.02%0.05%0.06%0.03%0.04%0.07%0.06%0.30%0.16%0.16%

Drawdowns

PAC vs. CNDX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAC drawdown since its inception was -73.20%, which is greater than CNDX.L's maximum drawdown of -35.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAC and CNDX.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PACCNDX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.20%

-35.17%

-38.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.31%

-12.06%

-13.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.83%

-35.17%

-7.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.65%

-35.17%

-31.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.26%

-7.55%

-9.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.50%

-5.35%

-11.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.17%

2.95%

+6.22%

Volatility

PAC vs. CNDX.L - Volatility Comparison

Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. (PAC) has a higher volatility of 10.31% compared to iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L) at 6.11%. This indicates that PAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNDX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PACCNDX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.31%

6.11%

+4.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.56%

11.94%

+11.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.74%

19.67%

+11.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.99%

20.86%

+15.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.34%

20.01%

+18.33%