PABU vs. SIXA

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

PABU (iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF) and SIXA (6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. PABU is passively managed, while SIXA is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, PABU returned 16.34%/yr vs 19.96%/yr for SIXA. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PABU charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for SIXA.

Performance

PABU vs. SIXA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF (PABU) and 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PABU achieves a 5.10% return, which is significantly lower than SIXA's 13.49% return.

PABU

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: 0.35%
• 6M: 5.27%
• YTD: 5.10%
• 1Y: 14.45%
• 3Y*: 16.34%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SIXA

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: -0.26%
• 6M: 11.49%
• YTD: 13.49%
• 1Y: 17.81%
• 3Y*: 19.96%
• 5Y*: 12.50%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PABU vs. SIXA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
PABU iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF	5.10%	13.08%	24.84%	29.51%	-15.45%
SIXA 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF	13.49%	15.52%	22.70%	11.98%	-3.64%

Correlation

The correlation between PABU and SIXA is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2022	0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between PABU and SIXA has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PABU vs. SIXA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PABU	SIXA
Technology	51.5%	19.2%
Real Estate	16.2%	1.3%
Communication Services	8.4%	13.9%
Financial Services	7.1%	7.7%
Consumer Cyclical	6.4%	3.9%
Healthcare	5.9%	14.5%
Industrials	1.9%	6.5%
Utilities	1.7%	5.0%
Energy	0.7%	4.8%
Basic Materials	0.5%	-
Consumer Defensive	-	23.2%

Return for Risk

PABU vs. SIXA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PABU

PABU Risk / Return Rank: 31
PABU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
PABU Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
PABU Omega Ratio Rank: 32
PABU Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
PABU Martin Ratio Rank: 30

SIXA

SIXA Risk / Return Rank: 80
SIXA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
SIXA Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
SIXA Omega Ratio Rank: 76
SIXA Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
SIXA Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PABU vs. SIXA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF (PABU) and 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PABU	SIXA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	2.01	-1.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.44	3.02	-1.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.35	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.08	3.20	-2.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.44	12.13	-8.69

PABU vs. SIXA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PABU Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the SIXA Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PABU and SIXA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PABU vs. SIXA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PABU drawdown since its inception was -22.76%, which is greater than SIXA's maximum drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PABU and SIXA.

Drawdown Indicators

	PABU	SIXA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.76%	-18.38%	-4.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.40%	-5.59%	-7.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.85%	-11.22%	-9.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.38%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.15%	-0.73%	-4.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.62%	-2.95%	-2.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.21%	1.47%	+2.74%

Volatility

PABU vs. SIXA - Volatility Comparison

iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF (PABU) has a higher volatility of 4.97% compared to 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA) at 2.35%. This indicates that PABU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIXA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PABU	SIXA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.97%	2.35%	+2.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.87%	6.94%	+4.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.38%	8.89%	+5.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.71%	12.78%	+5.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.71%	13.28%	+5.43%

PABU vs. SIXA - Expense Ratio Comparison

PABU has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SIXA's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

PABU vs. SIXA - Dividend Comparison

PABU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than SIXA's 2.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PABU iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF	0.93%	0.90%	1.00%	1.06%	1.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SIXA 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF	2.02%	2.31%	1.62%	2.12%	2.23%	1.63%	1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PABU and SIXA in my portfolio?

PABU and SIXA have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PABU or SIXA?

PABU has higher volatility (4.97%) compared to SIXA (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PABU dropped -22.76% vs SIXA's -18.38%.

Which ETF is better, PABU or SIXA?

On 3-year performance, SIXA leads with 19.96% vs 16.34% for PABU. On fees, PABU is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, SIXA has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PABU or SIXA?

Over the 3-year period, SIXA has performed better with a 19.96% return vs 16.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PABU or SIXA?

PABU is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for SIXA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PABU or SIXA?

SIXA has the higher dividend yield at 2.02%, compared with 0.93% for PABU.

What is the main difference between PABU and SIXA?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for PABU and 0.86% for SIXA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SIXA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.