PAAA vs. USFR

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

PAAA (PGIM AAA CLO ETF) and USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - PAAA is a CLO fund actively managed by PGIM, while USFR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. PAAA is actively managed, while USFR is passively managed. Over the past year, PAAA returned 5.02% vs 3.93% for USFR. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PAAA charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for USFR.

Performance

PAAA vs. USFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM AAA CLO ETF (PAAA) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAAA achieves a 2.51% return, which is significantly higher than USFR's 2.01% return.

PAAA

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.36%
• 6M: 2.31%
• YTD: 2.51%
• 1Y: 5.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

USFR

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.30%
• 6M: 1.90%
• YTD: 2.01%
• 1Y: 3.93%
• 3Y*: 4.71%
• 5Y*: 3.75%
• 10Y*: 2.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAAA vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PAAA PGIM AAA CLO ETF	2.51%	5.37%	7.47%	3.83%
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund	2.01%	4.23%	5.47%	2.18%

Correlation

The correlation between PAAA and USFR is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2023	0.08

Return for Risk

PAAA vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAAA

PAAA Risk / Return Rank: 99
PAAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
PAAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
PAAA Omega Ratio Rank: 99
PAAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
PAAA Martin Ratio Rank: 99

USFR

USFR Risk / Return Rank: 100
USFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
USFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
USFR Omega Ratio Rank: 100
USFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
USFR Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAAA vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM AAA CLO ETF (PAAA) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PAAA	USFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	10.92	14.83	-3.91
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	21.32	51.65	-30.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	6.79	14.08	-7.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	29.31	200.62	-171.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	181.99	801.27	-619.28

PAAA vs. USFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAAA Sharpe Ratio is 10.92, which is comparable to the USFR Sharpe Ratio of 14.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAAA and USFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PAAA vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAAA drawdown since its inception was -1.04%, smaller than the maximum USFR drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAAA and USFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAAA	USFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.04%	-1.36%	+0.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.17%	-0.02%	-0.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.06%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-0.18%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-0.80%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.02%	-0.15%	+0.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.03%	0.00%	+0.03%

Volatility

PAAA vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison

PGIM AAA CLO ETF (PAAA) has a higher volatility of 0.09% compared to WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.07%. This indicates that PAAA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAAA	USFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.09%	0.07%	+0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.36%	0.19%	+0.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47%	0.27%	+0.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.96%	0.39%	+0.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.96%	0.77%	+0.19%

PAAA vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAAA has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

PAAA vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison

PAAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, more than USFR's 3.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
PAAA PGIM AAA CLO ETF	4.84%	5.12%	5.88%	2.76%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund	3.84%	4.15%	5.17%	5.12%	1.78%	0.01%	0.40%	2.08%	1.67%	1.03%	0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PAAA and USFR in my portfolio?

PAAA and USFR have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PAAA or USFR?

PAAA has higher volatility (0.09%) compared to USFR (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAAA dropped -1.04% vs USFR's -1.36%.

Which ETF is better, PAAA or USFR?

On 1-year performance, PAAA leads with 5.02% vs 3.93% for USFR. On fees, USFR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PAAA or USFR?

Over the 1-year period, PAAA has performed better with a 5.02% return vs 3.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PAAA or USFR?

USFR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for PAAA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PAAA or USFR?

PAAA has the higher dividend yield at 4.84%, compared with 3.84% for USFR.

What is the main difference between PAAA and USFR?

PAAA is categorized as CLO, while USFR is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: PGIM and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for PAAA and 0.15% for USFR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

USFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.83 vs 10.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.