PAAA vs. PMAP

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

PAAA (PGIM AAA CLO ETF) and PMAP (PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April) are both exchange-traded funds - PAAA is a CLO fund actively managed by PGIM, while PMAP is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by PGIM. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PAAA returned 5.04% vs 6.57% for PMAP. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PAAA charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PMAP.

Performance

PAAA vs. PMAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM AAA CLO ETF (PAAA) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April (PMAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAAA achieves a 2.53% return, which is significantly lower than PMAP's 3.60% return.

PAAA

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.38%
• 6M: 2.29%
• YTD: 2.53%
• 1Y: 5.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PMAP

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.40%
• 6M: 3.37%
• YTD: 3.60%
• 1Y: 6.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAAA vs. PMAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PAAA PGIM AAA CLO ETF	2.53%	4.33%
PMAP PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April	3.60%	5.29%

Correlation

The correlation between PAAA and PMAP is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2025	0.32

Return for Risk

PAAA vs. PMAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAAA

PAAA Risk / Return Rank: 99
PAAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
PAAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
PAAA Omega Ratio Rank: 99
PAAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
PAAA Martin Ratio Rank: 99

PMAP

PMAP Risk / Return Rank: 99
PMAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
PMAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
PMAP Omega Ratio Rank: 99
PMAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
PMAP Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAAA vs. PMAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM AAA CLO ETF (PAAA) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April (PMAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PAAA	PMAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	10.87	5.72	+5.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	21.15	11.32	+9.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	6.75	2.60	+4.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	29.08	18.93	+10.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	180.52	93.14	+87.38

PAAA vs. PMAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAAA Sharpe Ratio is 10.87, which is higher than the PMAP Sharpe Ratio of 5.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAAA and PMAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PAAA vs. PMAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAAA drawdown since its inception was -1.04%, smaller than the maximum PMAP drawdown of -1.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAAA and PMAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAAA	PMAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.04%	-1.75%	+0.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.17%	-0.35%	+0.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.02%	-0.08%	+0.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.03%	0.07%	-0.04%

Volatility

PAAA vs. PMAP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM AAA CLO ETF (PAAA) is 0.09%, while PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April (PMAP) has a volatility of 0.37%. This indicates that PAAA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PMAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAAA	PMAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.09%	0.37%	-0.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.36%	0.90%	-0.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47%	1.16%	-0.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.96%	2.27%	-1.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.96%	2.27%	-1.31%

PAAA vs. PMAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAAA has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than PMAP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

PAAA vs. PMAP - Dividend Comparison

PAAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, while PMAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
PAAA PGIM AAA CLO ETF	4.84%	5.12%	5.88%	2.76%
PMAP PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PAAA and PMAP in my portfolio?

PAAA and PMAP have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PAAA or PMAP?

PMAP has higher volatility (0.37%) compared to PAAA (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAAA dropped -1.04% vs PMAP's -1.75%.

Which ETF is better, PAAA or PMAP?

On 1-year performance, PMAP leads with 6.57% vs 5.04% for PAAA. On fees, PAAA is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, PAAA has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PAAA or PMAP?

Over the 1-year period, PMAP has performed better with a 6.57% return vs 5.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PAAA or PMAP?

PAAA is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PMAP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PAAA or PMAP?

PAAA has the higher dividend yield at 4.84%, compared with 0.00% for PMAP.

What is the main difference between PAAA and PMAP?

PAAA is categorized as CLO, while PMAP is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for PAAA and 0.50% for PMAP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PAAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.87 vs 5.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.