PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAAA vs. FAAA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAAA vs. FAAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM AAA CLO ETF (PAAA) and Fidelity AAA CLO ETF (FAAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PAAA

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.40%
YTD
2.03%
6M
2.45%
1Y
5.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FAAA

1D
0.02%
1M
0.49%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAAA vs. FAAA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)
PAAA
PGIM AAA CLO ETF
1.38%
FAAA
Fidelity AAA CLO ETF
1.50%

Correlation

The correlation between PAAA and FAAA is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2026

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAAA vs. FAAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAAA
PAAA Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
PAAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAAA Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
PAAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAAA Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

FAAA
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAAA vs. FAAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM AAA CLO ETF (PAAA) and Fidelity AAA CLO ETF (FAAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PAAAFAAADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

10.83

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

21.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

6.72

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

30.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

187.65

PAAA vs. FAAA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAAAFAAADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

6.78

5.41

+1.37

Drawdowns

PAAA vs. FAAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAAA drawdown since its inception was -1.04%, which is greater than FAAA's maximum drawdown of -0.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAAA and FAAA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAAAFAAADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.04%

-0.55%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

0.00%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.02%

-0.07%

+0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.03%

Volatility

PAAA vs. FAAA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAAAFAAADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49%

0.94%

-0.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.98%

0.94%

+0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.98%

0.94%

+0.04%

PAAA vs. FAAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAAA has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than FAAA's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PAAA vs. FAAA - Dividend Comparison

PAAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, more than FAAA's 1.32% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
FAAA
Fidelity AAA CLO ETF
1.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PAAA
PGIM AAA CLO ETF
4.88%5.12%5.88%2.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAAA and FAAA have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PAAA is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PAAA is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for FAAA.

PAAA has the higher dividend yield at 4.88%, compared with 1.32% for FAAA.

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for PAAA and 0.20% for FAAA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAAA and FAAA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer