PAAA vs. CARY

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

PAAA (PGIM AAA CLO ETF) and CARY (Angel Oak Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PAAA is a CLO fund actively managed by PGIM, while CARY is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Angel Oak. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PAAA returned 5.10% vs 6.61% for CARY. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. PAAA charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for CARY.

Performance

PAAA vs. CARY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM AAA CLO ETF (PAAA) and Angel Oak Income ETF (CARY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAAA achieves a 2.14% return, which is significantly higher than CARY's 2.01% return.

PAAA

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: 2.14%
• 6M: 2.42%
• 1Y: 5.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CARY

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.71%
• YTD: 2.01%
• 6M: 2.44%
• 1Y: 6.61%
• 3Y*: 7.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAAA vs. CARY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PAAA PGIM AAA CLO ETF	2.14%	5.37%	7.47%	3.83%
CARY Angel Oak Income ETF	2.01%	7.54%	6.93%	4.50%

Correlation

The correlation between PAAA and CARY is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2023	-0.02

The correlation between PAAA and CARY shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PAAA vs. CARY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAAA

PAAA Risk / Return Rank: 99
PAAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
PAAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
PAAA Omega Ratio Rank: 99
PAAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
PAAA Martin Ratio Rank: 99

CARY

CARY Risk / Return Rank: 95
CARY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CARY Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
CARY Omega Ratio Rank: 97
CARY Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
CARY Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAAA vs. CARY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM AAA CLO ETF (PAAA) and Angel Oak Income ETF (CARY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PAAA	CARY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	10.94	3.66	+7.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	21.40	5.74	+15.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	6.66	1.81	+4.85
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	29.67	5.11	+24.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	183.78	22.04	+161.74

PAAA vs. CARY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAAA Sharpe Ratio is 10.94, which is higher than the CARY Sharpe Ratio of 3.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAAA and CARY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PAAA vs. CARY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAAA drawdown since its inception was -1.04%, smaller than the maximum CARY drawdown of -1.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAAA and CARY.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAAA	CARY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.04%	-1.96%	+0.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.17%	-1.28%	+1.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-1.96%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.02%	-0.32%	+0.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.03%	0.30%	-0.27%

Volatility

PAAA vs. CARY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM AAA CLO ETF (PAAA) is 0.11%, while Angel Oak Income ETF (CARY) has a volatility of 0.68%. This indicates that PAAA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CARY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAAA	CARY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.11%	0.68%	-0.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.35%	1.37%	-1.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47%	1.80%	-1.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.97%	2.73%	-1.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.97%	2.73%	-1.76%

PAAA vs. CARY - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAAA has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than CARY's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

PAAA vs. CARY - Dividend Comparison

PAAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, less than CARY's 5.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CARY Angel Oak Income ETF	5.92%	6.13%	6.10%	6.38%	0.48%
PAAA PGIM AAA CLO ETF	4.88%	5.12%	5.88%	2.76%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PAAA and CARY in my portfolio?

PAAA and CARY have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PAAA or CARY?

CARY has higher volatility (0.68%) compared to PAAA (0.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAAA dropped -1.04% vs CARY's -1.96%.

Which ETF is better, PAAA or CARY?

On 1-year performance, CARY leads with 6.61% vs 5.10% for PAAA. On fees, PAAA is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, PAAA has been the lower-risk option at 0.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PAAA or CARY?

Over the 1-year period, CARY has performed better with a 6.61% return vs 5.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PAAA or CARY?

PAAA is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for CARY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PAAA or CARY?

CARY has the higher dividend yield at 5.92%, compared with 4.88% for PAAA.

What is the main difference between PAAA and CARY?

PAAA is categorized as CLO, while CARY is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Angel Oak. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for PAAA and 0.80% for CARY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PAAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.94 vs 3.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.