OWNB vs. NODE
OWNB (Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF) and NODE (VanEck Onchain Economy ETF) are both Blockchain funds. OWNB is passively managed, while NODE is actively managed. Over the past year, OWNB returned -28.07% vs 71.73% for NODE. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. OWNB charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for NODE.
Performance
OWNB vs. NODE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OWNB achieves a -1.56% return, which is significantly lower than NODE's 33.28% return.
OWNB
- 1D
- -1.95%
- 1M
- -2.79%
- YTD
- -1.56%
- 6M
- -18.67%
- 1Y
- -28.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NODE
- 1D
- -1.79%
- 1M
- 10.04%
- YTD
- 33.28%
- 6M
- 21.22%
- 1Y
- 71.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OWNB vs. NODE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OWNB Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF | -1.56% | -23.33% |
NODE VanEck Onchain Economy ETF | 33.28% | 32.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between OWNB and NODE is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2025 | 0.87 |
The correlation between OWNB and NODE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OWNB vs. NODE — Risk / Return Rank
OWNB
NODE
OWNB vs. NODE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF (OWNB) and VanEck Onchain Economy ETF (NODE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OWNB | NODE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.26 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | 2.04 | -2.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.83 | 4.50 | -5.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OWNB | NODE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.49 | 1.59 | -2.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | 1.62 | -1.68 |
Drawdowns
OWNB vs. NODE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OWNB drawdown since its inception was -59.47%, which is greater than NODE's maximum drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OWNB and NODE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OWNB | NODE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.47% | -35.35% | -24.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.47% | -35.35% | -24.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.54% | -2.42% | -42.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.89% | -11.30% | -13.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.96% | 16.00% | +17.96% |
Volatility
OWNB vs. NODE - Volatility Comparison
Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF (OWNB) has a higher volatility of 13.15% compared to VanEck Onchain Economy ETF (NODE) at 12.39%. This indicates that OWNB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NODE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OWNB | NODE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.15% | 12.39% | +0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.52% | 34.83% | +7.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.85% | 45.44% | +12.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.36% | 44.59% | +17.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.36% | 44.59% | +17.77% |
OWNB vs. NODE - Expense Ratio Comparison
OWNB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than NODE's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
OWNB vs. NODE - Dividend Comparison
OWNB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, more than NODE's 0.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
NODE VanEck Onchain Economy ETF | 0.84% | 1.12% |
OWNB Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF | 0.88% | 0.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OWNB and NODE have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OWNB has higher volatility (13.15%) compared to NODE (12.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OWNB dropped -59.47% vs NODE's -35.35%.
On 1-year performance, NODE leads with 71.73% vs -28.07% for OWNB. On fees, NODE is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, NODE has been the lower-risk option at 12.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NODE has performed better with a 71.73% return vs -28.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NODE is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for OWNB.
OWNB has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.84% for NODE.
They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for OWNB and 0.69% for NODE.
NODE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OWNB and NODE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer