PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OWLLX vs. VRTVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OWLLX vs. VRTVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Channing Intrinsic Value Small-Cap Fund (OWLLX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OWLLX achieves a 16.30% return, which is significantly lower than VRTVX's 21.21% return.


OWLLX

1D
-0.15%
1M
5.53%
YTD
16.30%
6M
14.05%
1Y
32.49%
3Y*
15.68%
5Y*
10Y*

VRTVX

1D
0.47%
1M
3.65%
YTD
21.21%
6M
19.11%
1Y
43.12%
3Y*
19.49%
5Y*
7.66%
10Y*
10.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OWLLX vs. VRTVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
OWLLX
Channing Intrinsic Value Small-Cap Fund
16.30%7.46%10.69%19.71%-17.53%1.59%
VRTVX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
21.21%12.21%8.07%14.71%-14.52%1.37%

Correlation

The correlation between OWLLX and VRTVX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021

0.95

The correlation between OWLLX and VRTVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OWLLX vs. VRTVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OWLLX
OWLLX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
OWLLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OWLLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
OWLLX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
OWLLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
OWLLX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

VRTVX
VRTVX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
VRTVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRTVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRTVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VRTVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRTVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OWLLX vs. VRTVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Channing Intrinsic Value Small-Cap Fund (OWLLX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OWLLXVRTVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.42

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

5.30

-2.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.60

18.02

-10.42

OWLLX vs. VRTVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OWLLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the VRTVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OWLLX and VRTVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OWLLX vs. VRTVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OWLLX drawdown since its inception was -31.16%, smaller than the maximum VRTVX drawdown of -45.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OWLLX and VRTVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OWLLXVRTVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.16%

-45.98%

+14.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.10%

-8.54%

-5.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.16%

-26.85%

-4.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.45%

0.00%

-1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.25%

-7.75%

-1.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.53%

2.51%

+2.02%

Volatility

OWLLX vs. VRTVX - Volatility Comparison

Channing Intrinsic Value Small-Cap Fund (OWLLX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTVX) have volatilities of 5.34% and 5.28%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OWLLXVRTVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.34%

5.28%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.65%

12.47%

+2.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.43%

18.28%

+1.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.33%

21.66%

+0.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.33%

23.75%

-1.42%

OWLLX vs. VRTVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OWLLX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VRTVX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

OWLLX vs. VRTVX - Dividend Comparison

OWLLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than VRTVX's 1.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OWLLX
Channing Intrinsic Value Small-Cap Fund
0.56%0.65%0.45%0.49%0.41%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VRTVX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.65%1.49%1.84%2.08%2.15%1.56%1.54%1.87%2.17%1.74%1.52%2.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, OWLLX and VRTVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

OWLLX has higher volatility (5.34%) compared to VRTVX (5.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OWLLX dropped -31.16% vs VRTVX's -45.98%.

VRTVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OWLLX and VRTVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer