PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OWL vs. BOXX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OWL vs. BOXX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL) and Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OWL achieves a -32.30% return, which is significantly lower than BOXX's 1.58% return.


OWL

1D
-3.77%
1M
-1.99%
YTD
-32.30%
6M
-35.41%
1Y
-44.58%
3Y*
2.69%
5Y*
-2.82%
10Y*

BOXX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.58%
6M
1.97%
1Y
4.10%
3Y*
4.75%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OWL vs. BOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
OWL
Blue Owl Capital Inc.
-32.30%-32.83%61.76%47.40%3.41%
BOXX
Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF
1.58%4.37%5.16%5.04%0.07%

Correlation

The correlation between OWL and BOXX is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2022

-0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OWL vs. BOXX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OWL
OWL Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
OWL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OWL Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
OWL Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
OWL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
OWL Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

BOXX
BOXX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BOXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOXX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BOXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOXX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OWL vs. BOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL) and Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OWLBOXXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-13.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-39.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

9.98

-9.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.76

59.77

-60.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.38

531.84

-533.22

OWL vs. BOXX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OWL Sharpe Ratio is -1.03, which is lower than the BOXX Sharpe Ratio of 12.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OWL and BOXX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OWLBOXXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.03

12.84

-13.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

12.91

-12.84

Drawdowns

OWL vs. BOXX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OWL drawdown since its inception was -67.10%, which is greater than BOXX's maximum drawdown of -0.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OWL and BOXX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OWLBOXXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.10%

-0.12%

-66.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-58.59%

-0.07%

-58.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.10%

-0.12%

-66.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-60.35%

0.00%

-60.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.95%

-0.00%

-23.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

32.34%

0.01%

+32.33%

Volatility

OWL vs. BOXX - Volatility Comparison

Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL) has a higher volatility of 13.25% compared to Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) at 0.09%. This indicates that OWL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OWLBOXXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.25%

0.09%

+13.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.47%

0.25%

+34.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.25%

0.32%

+42.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.40%

0.37%

+43.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.69%

0.37%

+42.32%

Dividends

OWL vs. BOXX - Dividend Comparison

OWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.34%, while BOXX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BOXX
Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF
0.00%0.00%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OWL
Blue Owl Capital Inc.
9.34%5.72%2.92%3.69%4.06%0.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


OWL and BOXX have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OWL has higher volatility (13.25%) compared to BOXX (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OWL dropped -67.10% vs BOXX's -0.12%.

BOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (12.84 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OWL and BOXX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer