PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OWL vs. ASGI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OWL vs. ASGI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL) and Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund (ASGI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OWL achieves a -40.47% return, which is significantly lower than ASGI's 9.15% return.


OWL

1D
-0.58%
1M
-17.12%
YTD
-40.47%
6M
-41.68%
1Y
-53.07%
3Y*
-5.39%
5Y*
-3.88%
10Y*

ASGI

1D
1.14%
1M
-3.45%
YTD
9.15%
6M
7.32%
1Y
28.25%
3Y*
22.22%
5Y*
11.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OWL vs. ASGI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
OWL
Blue Owl Capital Inc.
-40.47%-32.83%61.76%47.40%-26.29%32.18%5.86%
ASGI
Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund
9.15%44.20%10.26%14.48%-10.50%18.17%-1.28%

Correlation

The correlation between OWL and ASGI is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2020

0.28

The correlation between OWL and ASGI shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.31 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OWL vs. ASGI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OWL
OWL Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
OWL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OWL Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
OWL Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
OWL Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
OWL Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

ASGI
ASGI Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
ASGI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASGI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASGI Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
ASGI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASGI Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OWL vs. ASGI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL) and Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund (ASGI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OWLASGIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.78

1.27

-0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.91

1.87

-2.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.52

5.90

-7.42

OWL vs. ASGI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OWL Sharpe Ratio is -1.20, which is lower than the ASGI Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OWL and ASGI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OWL vs. ASGI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OWL drawdown since its inception was -67.10%, which is greater than ASGI's maximum drawdown of -23.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OWL and ASGI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OWLASGIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.10%

-23.71%

-43.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-58.59%

-15.15%

-43.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.10%

-16.24%

-50.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.10%

-22.49%

-44.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.14%

-5.69%

-59.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.41%

-5.99%

-18.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.05%

4.80%

+30.25%

Volatility

OWL vs. ASGI - Volatility Comparison

Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL) has a higher volatility of 13.41% compared to Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund (ASGI) at 7.53%. This indicates that OWL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASGI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OWLASGIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.41%

7.53%

+5.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.97%

17.09%

+17.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.46%

19.26%

+25.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.07%

16.81%

+25.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.76%

17.52%

+25.24%

Dividends

OWL vs. ASGI - Dividend Comparison

OWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.62%, less than ASGI's 11.33% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
ASGI
Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund
11.33%10.96%12.84%8.03%8.25%6.33%1.76%
OWL
Blue Owl Capital Inc.
10.62%5.72%2.92%3.69%4.06%0.87%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


OWL and ASGI have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OWL has higher volatility (13.41%) compared to ASGI (7.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OWL dropped -67.10% vs ASGI's -23.71%.

ASGI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs -1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OWL and ASGI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer