OVT vs. BSCQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

OVT (Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF) and BSCQ (Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. OVT is actively managed, while BSCQ is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, OVT returned 3.01%/yr vs 1.47%/yr for BSCQ. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OVT charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for BSCQ.

Performance

OVT vs. BSCQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF (OVT) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OVT achieves a 2.61% return, which is significantly higher than BSCQ's 1.55% return.

OVT

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 0.55%
• YTD: 2.61%
• 6M: 3.07%
• 1Y: 8.92%
• 3Y*: 7.44%
• 5Y*: 3.01%
• 10Y*: —

BSCQ

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 1.55%
• 6M: 1.92%
• 1Y: 4.41%
• 3Y*: 5.06%
• 5Y*: 1.47%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OVT vs. BSCQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
OVT Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF	2.61%	7.61%	7.44%	7.73%	-9.68%	2.07%
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF	1.55%	5.02%	4.86%	5.71%	-8.31%	-1.25%

Correlation

The correlation between OVT and BSCQ is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2021	0.56

Over the past year, the correlation between OVT and BSCQ has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

OVT vs. BSCQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	OVT	BSCQ
Technology	35.6%	10.8%
Financial Services	11.8%	32.7%
Communication Services	11.2%	1.5%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	6.1%
Healthcare	8.5%	7.4%
Industrials	8.3%	6.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	3.9%
Energy	3.5%	3.0%
Utilities	2.4%	3.5%
Real Estate	1.9%	2.9%
Basic Materials	1.8%	0.5%

Return for Risk

OVT vs. BSCQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OVT

OVT Risk / Return Rank: 85
OVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
OVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
OVT Omega Ratio Rank: 84
OVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
OVT Martin Ratio Rank: 89

BSCQ

BSCQ Risk / Return Rank: 99
BSCQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Omega Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OVT vs. BSCQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF (OVT) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OVT	BSCQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.60	7.06	-4.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.83	15.22	-11.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	3.45	-1.93
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.78	43.24	-37.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.00	179.65	-159.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

OVT vs. BSCQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OVT Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is lower than the BSCQ Sharpe Ratio of 7.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OVT and BSCQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OVT	BSCQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.60	7.06	-4.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	0.45	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.69	0.60	+0.08

Drawdowns

OVT vs. BSCQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OVT drawdown since its inception was -13.59%, smaller than the maximum BSCQ drawdown of -16.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OVT and BSCQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	OVT	BSCQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.59%	-16.50%	+2.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.55%	-0.10%	-1.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.55%	-1.13%	-2.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.59%	-13.02%	-0.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.41%	0.00%	-0.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.39%	-2.85%	-0.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.45%	0.02%	+0.43%

Volatility

OVT vs. BSCQ - Volatility Comparison

Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF (OVT) has a higher volatility of 0.83% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ) at 0.17%. This indicates that OVT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSCQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OVT	BSCQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.83%	0.17%	+0.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.52%	0.43%	+2.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.44%	0.63%	+2.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.63%	3.30%	+1.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.54%	4.77%	-0.23%

OVT vs. BSCQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

OVT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCQ's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

OVT vs. BSCQ - Dividend Comparison

OVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.17%, more than BSCQ's 4.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF	4.12%	4.14%	4.05%	3.53%	2.54%	1.91%	2.42%	2.96%	3.32%	2.92%	0.51%
OVT Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF	8.17%	7.21%	6.15%	5.11%	4.12%	4.41%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OVT and BSCQ in my portfolio?

OVT and BSCQ have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OVT or BSCQ?

OVT has higher volatility (0.83%) compared to BSCQ (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OVT dropped -13.59% vs BSCQ's -16.50%.

Which ETF is better, OVT or BSCQ?

On 5-year performance, OVT leads with 3.01% vs 1.47% for BSCQ. On fees, BSCQ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, BSCQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OVT or BSCQ?

Over the 5-year period, OVT has performed better with a 3.01% return vs 1.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OVT or BSCQ?

BSCQ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for OVT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OVT or BSCQ?

OVT has the higher dividend yield at 8.17%, compared with 4.12% for BSCQ.

What is the main difference between OVT and BSCQ?

They also come from different issuers: Liquid Strategies and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for OVT and 0.10% for BSCQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BSCQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.06 vs 2.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.