OVL vs. JELM
OVL (Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF) and JELM (Janus Henderson Equity Linked Moderate Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.02 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. OVL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for JELM.
Performance
OVL vs. JELM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
OVL
- 1D
- 1.92%
- 1M
- 3.65%
- 6M
- 13.96%
- YTD
- 15.83%
- 1Y
- 27.20%
- 3Y*
- 23.21%
- 5Y*
- 13.56%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.47%
JELM
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $199.95K | $786.17K | $963.17K | |
| $9.49M | $8.05M | $6.55M |
OVL vs. JELM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
OVL Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF | 10.11% |
JELM Janus Henderson Equity Linked Moderate Income ETF | 2.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between OVL and JELM is 0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2026 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OVL vs. JELM — Risk / Return Rank
OVL
JELM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
OVL vs. JELM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF (OVL) and Janus Henderson Equity Linked Moderate Income ETF (JELM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OVL | JELM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.17 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OVL vs. JELM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OVL drawdown since its inception was -35.49%, which is greater than JELM's maximum drawdown of -0.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OVL and JELM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OVL | JELM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.49% | -0.69% | -34.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.25% | +0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.61% | -0.21% | -6.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | — | — |
Volatility
OVL vs. JELM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OVL | JELM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.88% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.69% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.19% | 3.69% | +11.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.94% | 3.69% | +16.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.45% | 3.69% | +18.76% |
OVL vs. JELM - Expense Ratio Comparison
OVL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than JELM's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
OVL vs. JELM - Dividend Comparison
OVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.15%, more than JELM's 1.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JELM Janus Henderson Equity Linked Moderate Income ETF | 1.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OVL Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF | 7.15% | 2.99% | 3.10% | 3.33% | 3.85% | 3.63% | 2.43% | 0.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OVL and JELM have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JELM is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JELM is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for OVL.
OVL has the higher dividend yield at 7.15%, compared with 1.21% for JELM.
They also come from different issuers: Liquid Strategies and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for OVL and 0.59% for JELM.
Find the right allocation for OVL and JELM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer