OVL vs. FTQI
OVL (Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF) and FTQI (First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OVL is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Liquid Strategies, while FTQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. OVL is actively managed, while FTQI is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, OVL returned 13.69%/yr vs 12.43%/yr for FTQI. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OVL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FTQI.
Performance
OVL vs. FTQI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with OVL having a 13.42% return and FTQI slightly higher at 13.57%.
OVL
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- 6M
- 11.66%
- YTD
- 13.42%
- 1Y
- 26.37%
- 3Y*
- 22.08%
- 5Y*
- 13.69%
- 10Y*
- —
FTQI
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 1.97%
- 6M
- 12.76%
- YTD
- 13.57%
- 1Y
- 27.70%
- 3Y*
- 16.98%
- 5Y*
- 12.43%
- 10Y*
- 7.68%
OVL vs. FTQI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OVL Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF | 13.42% | 17.81% | 27.91% | 28.01% | -22.18% | 32.40% | 20.17% | 8.73% |
FTQI First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF | 13.57% | 12.68% | 18.30% | 23.63% | -8.77% | 10.46% | -6.54% | 0.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between OVL and FTQI is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2019 | 0.76 |
The correlation between OVL and FTQI shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (all time) to 0.90 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
OVL vs. FTQI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OVL
FTQI
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
OVL
FTQI
Financial Services
OVL
FTQI
Communication Services
OVL
FTQI
Consumer Cyclical
OVL
FTQI
Healthcare
OVL
FTQI
Industrials
OVL
FTQI
Consumer Defensive
OVL
FTQI
Energy
OVL
FTQI
Utilities
OVL
FTQI
Real Estate
OVL
FTQI
Basic Materials
OVL
FTQI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OVL vs. FTQI — Risk / Return Rank
OVL
FTQI
OVL vs. FTQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF (OVL) and First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OVL | FTQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.48 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.03 | 4.46 | -1.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.27 | 21.13 | -8.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OVL vs. FTQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OVL drawdown since its inception was -35.49%, which is greater than FTQI's maximum drawdown of -19.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OVL and FTQI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OVL | FTQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.49% | -19.42% | -16.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.73% | -6.24% | -2.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.73% | -19.42% | -2.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.23% | -19.42% | -9.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -19.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | -0.13% | -0.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.65% | -3.73% | -2.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 1.31% | +0.84% |
Volatility
OVL vs. FTQI - Volatility Comparison
Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF (OVL) has a higher volatility of 4.26% compared to First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI) at 2.86%. This indicates that OVL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OVL | FTQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.26% | 2.86% | +1.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.50% | 8.79% | +2.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.72% | 10.84% | +3.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.91% | 14.82% | +5.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.47% | 12.98% | +9.49% |
OVL vs. FTQI - Expense Ratio Comparison
OVL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FTQI's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
OVL vs. FTQI - Dividend Comparison
OVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.39%, less than FTQI's 10.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTQI First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF | 10.84% | 11.46% | 11.66% | 11.49% | 9.85% | 3.05% | 3.27% | 2.95% | 3.27% | 2.74% | 3.02% | 3.54% |
OVL Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF | 6.39% | 2.99% | 3.10% | 3.33% | 3.85% | 3.63% | 2.43% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OVL and FTQI have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OVL has higher volatility (4.26%) compared to FTQI (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OVL dropped -35.49% vs FTQI's -19.42%.
On 5-year performance, OVL leads with 13.69% vs 12.43% for FTQI. On fees, FTQI is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, FTQI has been the lower-risk option at 2.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OVL has performed better with a 13.69% return vs 12.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTQI is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for OVL.
FTQI has the higher dividend yield at 10.84%, compared with 6.39% for OVL.
OVL is categorized as Derivative Income, while FTQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Liquid Strategies and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for OVL and 0.75% for FTQI.
FTQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OVL and FTQI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer