PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OTCFX vs. TRCSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OTCFX vs. TRCSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Stock Fund (OTCFX) and T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Index Fund (TRCSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OTCFX achieves a 15.89% return, which is significantly lower than TRCSX's 21.75% return.


OTCFX

1D
0.49%
1M
4.68%
YTD
15.89%
6M
13.37%
1Y
27.06%
3Y*
16.02%
5Y*
5.43%
10Y*
12.33%

TRCSX

1D
0.86%
1M
4.85%
YTD
21.75%
6M
18.92%
1Y
42.62%
3Y*
19.73%
5Y*
6.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OTCFX vs. TRCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
OTCFX
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Stock Fund
15.89%8.37%11.48%17.56%-23.47%9.49%
TRCSX
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Index Fund
21.75%12.72%11.36%16.97%-20.47%4.05%

Correlation

The correlation between OTCFX and TRCSX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2021

0.92

The correlation between OTCFX and TRCSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.93 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OTCFX vs. TRCSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OTCFX
OTCFX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
OTCFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OTCFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
OTCFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
OTCFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
OTCFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

TRCSX
TRCSX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
TRCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
TRCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OTCFX vs. TRCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Stock Fund (OTCFX) and T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Index Fund (TRCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OTCFXTRCSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.40

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

4.57

-1.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.32

15.85

-5.52

OTCFX vs. TRCSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OTCFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the TRCSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OTCFX and TRCSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OTCFX vs. TRCSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OTCFX drawdown since its inception was -56.37%, which is greater than TRCSX's maximum drawdown of -31.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OTCFX and TRCSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OTCFXTRCSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.37%

-31.94%

-24.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.75%

-10.96%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.51%

-27.82%

+4.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.44%

-31.94%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.22%

-13.38%

+5.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

3.03%

-0.22%

Volatility

OTCFX vs. TRCSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Stock Fund (OTCFX) is 6.01%, while T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Index Fund (TRCSX) has a volatility of 6.40%. This indicates that OTCFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRCSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OTCFXTRCSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.01%

6.40%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.63%

14.49%

+0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.53%

20.18%

-1.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.14%

23.24%

-3.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.47%

23.12%

-2.65%

OTCFX vs. TRCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OTCFX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than TRCSX's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

OTCFX vs. TRCSX - Dividend Comparison

OTCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.15%, more than TRCSX's 1.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OTCFX
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Stock Fund
6.15%7.13%16.00%3.80%4.12%7.08%2.28%5.35%12.43%8.39%1.89%10.93%
TRCSX
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Index Fund
1.97%2.39%3.18%1.27%1.58%1.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


OTCFX and TRCSX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRCSX has higher volatility (6.40%) compared to OTCFX (6.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OTCFX dropped -56.37% vs TRCSX's -31.94%.

TRCSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OTCFX and TRCSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer