OTCFX vs. PRGTX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

OTCFX (T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Stock Fund) and PRGTX (T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund) are both mutual funds - OTCFX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by T. Rowe Price, while PRGTX is a Technology Equities fund managed by T. Rowe Price. Over the past 10 years, OTCFX returned 12.33%/yr vs 20.21%/yr for PRGTX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OTCFX charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for PRGTX.

Performance

OTCFX vs. PRGTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Stock Fund (OTCFX) and T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OTCFX achieves a 15.89% return, which is significantly lower than PRGTX's 42.49% return. Over the past 10 years, OTCFX has underperformed PRGTX with an annualized return of 12.33%, while PRGTX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.21% annualized return.

OTCFX

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 4.68%
• YTD: 15.89%
• 6M: 13.37%
• 1Y: 27.06%
• 3Y*: 16.02%
• 5Y*: 5.43%
• 10Y*: 12.33%

PRGTX

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: 7.41%
• YTD: 42.49%
• 6M: 42.54%
• 1Y: 73.93%
• 3Y*: 39.48%
• 5Y*: 9.67%
• 10Y*: 20.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OTCFX vs. PRGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
OTCFX T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Stock Fund	15.89%	8.37%	11.48%	17.56%	-23.47%	17.07%	25.05%	33.61%	-3.39%	15.13%
PRGTX T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund	42.49%	27.28%	33.12%	55.92%	-55.53%	8.85%	75.77%	34.22%	-10.07%	47.09%

Correlation

The correlation between OTCFX and PRGTX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001	0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between OTCFX and PRGTX has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

OTCFX vs. PRGTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OTCFX

OTCFX Risk / Return Rank: 43
OTCFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
OTCFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
OTCFX Omega Ratio Rank: 32
OTCFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
OTCFX Martin Ratio Rank: 54

PRGTX

PRGTX Risk / Return Rank: 88
PRGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
PRGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
PRGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
PRGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
PRGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OTCFX vs. PRGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Stock Fund (OTCFX) and T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OTCFX	PRGTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	2.92	-1.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.36	3.42	-1.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.49	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.73	5.81	-3.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.32	17.27	-6.94

OTCFX vs. PRGTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OTCFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the PRGTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OTCFX and PRGTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OTCFX vs. PRGTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OTCFX drawdown since its inception was -56.37%, smaller than the maximum PRGTX drawdown of -71.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OTCFX and PRGTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	OTCFX	PRGTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.37%	-71.18%	+14.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.75%	-13.06%	+2.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.51%	-26.67%	+3.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.44%	-65.29%	+32.85%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.71%	-65.29%	+27.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.18%	+1.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.22%	-21.50%	+13.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.81%	4.38%	-1.57%

Volatility

OTCFX vs. PRGTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Stock Fund (OTCFX) is 6.01%, while T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX) has a volatility of 13.28%. This indicates that OTCFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OTCFX	PRGTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.01%	13.28%	-7.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.63%	21.87%	-7.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.53%	25.99%	-7.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.14%	32.18%	-12.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.47%	28.64%	-8.17%

OTCFX vs. PRGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OTCFX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than PRGTX's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

OTCFX vs. PRGTX - Dividend Comparison

OTCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.15%, while PRGTX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
OTCFX T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Stock Fund	6.15%	7.13%	16.00%	3.80%	4.12%	7.08%	2.28%	5.35%	12.43%	8.39%	1.89%	10.93%
PRGTX T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.28%	27.71%	5.05%	0.15%	24.67%	15.81%	9.46%	10.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OTCFX and PRGTX in my portfolio?

OTCFX and PRGTX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OTCFX or PRGTX?

PRGTX has higher volatility (13.28%) compared to OTCFX (6.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OTCFX dropped -56.37% vs PRGTX's -71.18%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PRGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.