PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OTCFX vs. PRGTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OTCFX vs. PRGTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Stock Fund (OTCFX) and T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OTCFX achieves a 10.41% return, which is significantly lower than PRGTX's 44.18% return. Over the past 10 years, OTCFX has underperformed PRGTX with an annualized return of 11.45%, while PRGTX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.61% annualized return.


OTCFX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.95%
YTD
10.41%
6M
9.68%
1Y
22.00%
3Y*
14.44%
5Y*
4.91%
10Y*
11.45%

PRGTX

1D
1.35%
1M
20.72%
YTD
44.18%
6M
43.53%
1Y
79.97%
3Y*
40.07%
5Y*
12.30%
10Y*
19.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OTCFX vs. PRGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OTCFX
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Stock Fund
10.41%8.37%11.48%17.56%-23.47%17.07%25.05%33.61%-3.39%15.13%
PRGTX
T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund
44.18%27.28%33.12%55.92%-55.53%8.85%75.77%34.22%-10.07%47.09%

Correlation

The correlation between OTCFX and PRGTX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001

0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between OTCFX and PRGTX has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OTCFX vs. PRGTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OTCFX
OTCFX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
OTCFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OTCFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
OTCFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
OTCFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
OTCFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

PRGTX
PRGTX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
PRGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
PRGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OTCFX vs. PRGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Stock Fund (OTCFX) and T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OTCFXPRGTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.58

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

6.32

-4.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.57

19.93

-11.36

OTCFX vs. PRGTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OTCFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the PRGTX Sharpe Ratio of 3.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OTCFX and PRGTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OTCFXPRGTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

3.57

-2.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.39

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.69

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.47

+0.10

Drawdowns

OTCFX vs. PRGTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OTCFX drawdown since its inception was -56.37%, smaller than the maximum PRGTX drawdown of -71.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OTCFX and PRGTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OTCFXPRGTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.37%

-71.18%

+14.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.75%

-13.06%

+2.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.51%

-26.67%

+3.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.44%

-65.29%

+32.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.71%

-65.29%

+27.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.06%

0.00%

-2.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.23%

-21.54%

+13.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

4.13%

-1.35%

Volatility

OTCFX vs. PRGTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Stock Fund (OTCFX) is 5.03%, while T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX) has a volatility of 8.26%. This indicates that OTCFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OTCFXPRGTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.03%

8.26%

-3.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.26%

18.69%

-4.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.85%

23.11%

-5.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.02%

31.80%

-11.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.41%

28.39%

-7.98%

OTCFX vs. PRGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OTCFX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than PRGTX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

OTCFX vs. PRGTX - Dividend Comparison

OTCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.45%, while PRGTX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OTCFX
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Stock Fund
6.45%7.13%16.00%3.80%4.12%7.08%2.28%5.35%12.43%8.39%1.89%10.93%
PRGTX
T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.28%27.71%5.05%0.15%24.67%15.81%9.46%10.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


OTCFX and PRGTX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRGTX has higher volatility (8.26%) compared to OTCFX (5.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OTCFX dropped -56.37% vs PRGTX's -71.18%.

PRGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.57 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OTCFX and PRGTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer