OSCV vs. FESM
OSCV (Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF) and FESM (Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, OSCV returned 15.66% vs 50.92% for FESM. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. OSCV charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for FESM.
Performance
OSCV vs. FESM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OSCV achieves a 9.18% return, which is significantly lower than FESM's 21.47% return.
OSCV
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -2.06%
- YTD
- 9.18%
- 6M
- 8.64%
- 1Y
- 15.66%
- 3Y*
- 10.33%
- 5Y*
- 5.36%
- 10Y*
- —
FESM
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 4.43%
- YTD
- 21.47%
- 6M
- 22.64%
- 1Y
- 50.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OSCV vs. FESM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
OSCV Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF | 9.18% | 1.35% | 11.66% | 7.27% |
FESM Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF | 21.47% | 17.88% | 16.22% | 12.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between OSCV and FESM is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2023 | 0.84 |
The correlation between OSCV and FESM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
OSCV vs. FESM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OSCV
FESM
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
OSCV
FESM
Industrials
OSCV
FESM
Energy
OSCV
FESM
Consumer Cyclical
OSCV
FESM
Real Estate
OSCV
FESM
Healthcare
OSCV
FESM
Basic Materials
OSCV
FESM
Utilities
OSCV
FESM
Consumer Defensive
OSCV
FESM
Technology
OSCV
FESM
Communication Services
OSCV
-
FESM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OSCV vs. FESM — Risk / Return Rank
OSCV
FESM
OSCV vs. FESM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV) and Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF (FESM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OSCV | FESM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.18 | 2.71 | -1.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.83 | 3.61 | -1.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.44 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 5.06 | -3.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.97 | 18.28 | -12.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OSCV | FESM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 2.71 | -1.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 1.33 | -0.96 |
Drawdowns
OSCV vs. FESM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OSCV drawdown since its inception was -42.40%, which is greater than FESM's maximum drawdown of -26.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OSCV and FESM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OSCV | FESM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.40% | -26.93% | -15.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.55% | -10.18% | +2.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.71% | -0.09% | -2.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.60% | -4.80% | -2.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 2.82% | -0.27% |
Volatility
OSCV vs. FESM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV) is 3.54%, while Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF (FESM) has a volatility of 5.38%. This indicates that OSCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FESM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OSCV | FESM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.54% | 5.38% | -1.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.43% | 13.29% | -3.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.35% | 18.91% | -5.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.25% | 21.25% | -4.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.91% | 21.25% | -0.34% |
OSCV vs. FESM - Expense Ratio Comparison
OSCV has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FESM's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
OSCV vs. FESM - Dividend Comparison
OSCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, more than FESM's 0.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FESM Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.08% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OSCV Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF | 1.10% | 1.23% | 1.29% | 1.55% | 1.12% | 1.06% | 1.11% | 1.75% | 0.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OSCV and FESM have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FESM has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to OSCV (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OSCV dropped -42.40% vs FESM's -26.93%.
On 1-year performance, FESM leads with 50.92% vs 15.66% for OSCV. On fees, FESM is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, OSCV has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FESM has performed better with a 50.92% return vs 15.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FESM is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for OSCV.
OSCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.10%, compared with 0.53% for FESM.
They also come from different issuers: Aptus Capital Advisors and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for OSCV and 0.28% for FESM.
FESM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OSCV and FESM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer