OSCV vs. DRSK

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

OSCV (Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF) and DRSK (Aptus Defined Risk ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OSCV is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Aptus Capital Advisors, while DRSK is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Aptus Capital Advisors. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, OSCV returned 5.36%/yr vs 3.23%/yr for DRSK. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

OSCV vs. DRSK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV) and Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OSCV achieves a 9.18% return, which is significantly higher than DRSK's 4.60% return.

OSCV

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: -2.06%
• YTD: 9.18%
• 6M: 8.64%
• 1Y: 15.66%
• 3Y*: 10.33%
• 5Y*: 5.36%
• 10Y*: —

DRSK

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: 3.32%
• YTD: 4.60%
• 6M: 2.89%
• 1Y: 9.64%
• 3Y*: 9.32%
• 5Y*: 3.23%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OSCV vs. DRSK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
OSCV Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF	9.18%	1.35%	11.66%	10.14%	-11.41%	27.69%	4.94%	27.51%	-15.29%
DRSK Aptus Defined Risk ETF	4.60%	7.67%	12.50%	2.08%	-9.57%	0.88%	13.80%	12.64%	2.40%

Correlation

The correlation between OSCV and DRSK is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2018	0.38

OSCV vs. DRSK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	OSCV	DRSK
Financial Services	27.6%	11.8%
Industrials	17.0%	8.3%
Energy	11.3%	3.5%
Consumer Cyclical	9.9%	10.1%
Real Estate	8.5%	1.9%
Healthcare	8.3%	8.5%
Basic Materials	5.6%	1.8%
Utilities	3.1%	2.4%
Consumer Defensive	2.0%	4.9%
Technology	2.0%	35.6%
Communication Services	-	11.2%

Return for Risk

OSCV vs. DRSK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OSCV

OSCV Risk / Return Rank: 35
OSCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
OSCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
OSCV Omega Ratio Rank: 31
OSCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
OSCV Martin Ratio Rank: 37

DRSK

DRSK Risk / Return Rank: 30
DRSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
DRSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
DRSK Omega Ratio Rank: 31
DRSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
DRSK Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OSCV vs. DRSK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV) and Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OSCV	DRSK	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.18	1.18	0.00
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.83	1.84	-0.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.21	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.02	1.32	+0.69
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.97	3.41	+2.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

OSCV vs. DRSK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OSCV Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the DRSK Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OSCV and DRSK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OSCV	DRSK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.18	1.18	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31	0.44	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.37	0.82	-0.45

Drawdowns

OSCV vs. DRSK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OSCV drawdown since its inception was -42.40%, which is greater than DRSK's maximum drawdown of -19.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OSCV and DRSK.

Drawdown Indicators

	OSCV	DRSK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.40%	-19.87%	-22.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.55%	-7.20%	-0.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.92%	-9.60%	-13.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.92%	-19.87%	-3.05%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.71%	-0.44%	-2.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.60%	-4.21%	-3.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.55%	2.79%	-0.24%

Volatility

OSCV vs. DRSK - Volatility Comparison

Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV) has a higher volatility of 3.54% compared to Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK) at 2.92%. This indicates that OSCV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRSK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OSCV	DRSK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.54%	2.92%	+0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.43%	5.18%	+4.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.35%	8.22%	+5.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.25%	7.39%	+9.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.91%	7.05%	+13.86%

OSCV vs. DRSK - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both OSCV and DRSK have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

OSCV vs. DRSK - Dividend Comparison

OSCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than DRSK's 3.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DRSK Aptus Defined Risk ETF	3.60%	3.67%	3.31%	3.57%	1.93%	2.64%	5.69%	3.04%	2.62%
OSCV Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF	1.10%	1.23%	1.29%	1.55%	1.12%	1.06%	1.11%	1.75%	0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OSCV and DRSK in my portfolio?

OSCV and DRSK have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OSCV or DRSK?

OSCV has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to DRSK (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OSCV dropped -42.40% vs DRSK's -19.87%.

Which ETF is better, OSCV or DRSK?

On 5-year performance, OSCV leads with 5.36% vs 3.23% for DRSK. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, DRSK has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OSCV or DRSK?

Over the 5-year period, OSCV has performed better with a 5.36% return vs 3.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OSCV or DRSK?

OSCV and DRSK have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OSCV or DRSK?

DRSK has the higher dividend yield at 3.60%, compared with 1.10% for OSCV.

What is the main difference between OSCV and DRSK?

OSCV is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while DRSK is Diversified Portfolio.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OSCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.